-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 250
2024‐09‐27
Attendance (7): Bruce Bailey, Francis Storr, Gundula Nieumann, Ken Franqueiro, Lori Oakley, Mike Gower, Scott O'Hara
Regrets: Alastair Campbell, Patrick Lauke, Giacomo Petri
- Per agenda email attendance is expected to be light due to overlap with TPAC
- Incorporated style changes for CFC email to list.
- Updated Reflow understanding doc #4055 is still in a work in progress and purposely has its status set as Draft. Please do read the preview version and be encouraged to provide feedback on the most polished portions.
- Regrets from Gundula for next week.
- Regrets from Mike for the next two call.
Following our standing agenda, working from the Project Board.
Add note about the scope of 1.4.5 Images of Text (images used rather than text) and example #4021 which TF agreed with in principle, and almost verbatim. After much discussion, we changed "The text replicates an image of text" to "The text in an image is reproduced in text" as being better plain language. Consistent with other recent nuanced discussion, we deliberately decided not to link to the defined term. Returned to Sent for AG approval.
CFC style updates #4080 Mike generated a PR that is solely about matching W3C style in our technical document. All of the style changes have been discussed before (and are part of our own style guide as well as in place for the wider W3C and EO guides), but Mike had been delaying implementing in order to avoid conflicts with other omnibus changes. There are no content altered as part of this beyond setting some initial capitals to lower case, and the altering of "website" into one word (unlike web page). One question to EO on Layers of Guidance section which uses title case. Moved to Sent for approval.
Input Purposes for User Interface Components is an appendix, so should be marked as non-normative #3777 discussed briefly. Item remains in Kevin's queue for reconciliation.
Paraphrasing, Restore the need for accuracy/correctness to 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions #3984 is requesting adding "accurate" or "correct" to the Understanding. Earlier, Mike has tagged as Response Only, has that response in the Issue thread. Consensus on call is is to link to Understanding 2.4.6 (which is due for an editorial refresh). Please Thumbs Up comments where you strongly agree. Please also read conversation thread in linked PR. Resolution will probably be in a different PR. Left in Drafted column.
[Updated F52 page title and h1 heading to match the related SC #4074][../pull/4074] Discussed ever briefly, and Lori offered to lead conversation for call next week (10/4). Stays in Drafted for now.
Time permitting, items of interest to participants, including open discussions.