Add OAE technologies and their parameters #1741
Conversation
| mix0 0 0 | ||
| eta 1.00 1.00 | ||
| omf 0.84 0.025 | ||
| inco0 0.01 18800 200 400 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should inco0 not be converted to USD/tC from USD/tCaO as calculated below? And why is inco0 for DACCS a factor of 100 higher?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should, but this inco0 is converted inside the code as the cost USD/tC depends on efficiency which a user can set. The capex is only 15$/tCaO, hence the difference between OAE and DACCS. You can see the calculations below in the same file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could you give an example of an efficiency, or even better the whole range we use, so that one can follow these conversions and compare them with DAC?
|
Almost :) let me just update the input data version and test it quickly and I'll merge it |
|
Change of plans, I will merge this first and then update the input data version in a separate PR, as some little fixes are need for that input data to work |
Purpose of this PR
Adding OAE (ocean alkalinity enhancement) technologies to
all_teto generate new input data with OAE. A PR to add it as a CDR option will follow.