Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Evochain Collections by contractAddress instead of collectionId #148

Closed
tonimateos opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #160, #164, #163, #173 or #179
Closed

Evochain Collections by contractAddress instead of collectionId #148

tonimateos opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #160, #164, #163, #173 or #179
Labels
High Priority Proposed to focus on this when other tasks are present Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint

Comments

@tonimateos
Copy link
Contributor

tonimateos commented Nov 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

As a DApp developer I want the interface with evochain collections to be as similar as possible to my current flows, so I have to modify as little as possible to use the evochain.

ACCEPTANCE

  • the new interface definition is agreed: here
  • the new interface is implemented: I can use all the methods as expected, and check all the events as expected
@tonimateos tonimateos added Grooming Needed Extra attention is needed Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint High Priority Proposed to focus on this when other tasks are present and removed Grooming Needed Extra attention is needed labels Nov 8, 2023
@magecnion magecnion self-assigned this Nov 9, 2023
This was linked to pull requests Nov 9, 2023
Update Create Collection Functionality to Return Address Instead of Collection ID #160
Merged
Refactor Mock Implementation in Tests #164
Merged
use precompiles smart contract definition at build step in ci #163
Merged
@magecnion magecnion linked a pull request Nov 14, 2023 that will close this issue
Update Evolving Assets Logic to Use Contract Address #173
Merged
@magecnion magecnion removed their assignment Nov 15, 2023
@asiniscalchi asiniscalchi self-assigned this Nov 15, 2023
@magecnion magecnion linked a pull request Nov 15, 2023 that will close this issue
Improve Error Messages in Test Cases #178
Closed
@asiniscalchi asiniscalchi removed their assignment Nov 15, 2023
@magecnion magecnion self-assigned this Nov 15, 2023
This was linked to pull requests Nov 15, 2023
Refactor Collection Address Format #179
Merged
Separate Collection Contracts Management into a New Precompile #180
Merged
@magecnion magecnion removed their assignment Nov 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
High Priority Proposed to focus on this when other tasks are present Sprint Candidate Proposed by PO for the very next sprint
Projects
LAOS
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@asiniscalchi @magecnion @tonimateos