Evochain Collections by contractAddress instead of collectionId #148
Labels
High Priority
Proposed to focus on this when other tasks are present
Sprint Candidate
Proposed by PO for the very next sprint
As a DApp developer I want the interface with evochain collections to be as similar as possible to my current flows, so I have to modify as little as possible to use the evochain.
ACCEPTANCE
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: