Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Industry Core KIT] BugFix: remove faulty JSON-examples for aspect models #1056

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -179,10 +179,6 @@ Aspect model in GitHub:
"key": "manufacturerId",
"value": "BPNL7588787849VQ"
},
{
"key": "manufacturerPartId",
"value": "95657362-83"
},
{
"key": "partInstanceId",
"value": "OEM-A-F8LM95T92WJ9KNDD3HA5P"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -231,10 +227,6 @@ Aspect model in GitHub:
"key": "manufacturerId",
"value": "BPNL7588787849VQ"
},
{
"key": "manufacturerPartId",
"value": "95657362-83"
},
{
"key": "partInstanceId",
"value": "NO-574868639429552535768526"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -293,13 +285,13 @@ Aspect model in GitHub:
"key": "batchId"
},
{
"value": "123-0.740-3434-A",
"key": "manufacturerPartId"
"key": "manufacturerId",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at the batch aspect itself, I still see differences between the semantic model example and how we describe it here. What you did is an improvement, for sure: Would you also remove the resulting differences?
I guess this also applies to the other aspect models

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eckardg regarding the "differences", do you mean changing the examples in the Aspect models?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, currently when I compare the examples in the aspect models and the examples in the KIT I see differences. Wouldn'it it be easier to adapt the examples in the KIT?

"value": "BPNL7588787849VQ"
},
],
"manufacturingInformation": {
"date": "2022-02-04T14:48:54",
"country": "HUR",
"country": "DEU",
"sites": [
{
"catenaXsiteId": "BPNS1234567890ZZ",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -355,14 +347,6 @@ Aspect model in GitHub:
"key": "parentOrderNumber",
"value": "OEM-A-F8LM95T92WJ9KNDD3HA5P"
},
{
"key": "manufacturerPartId",
"value": "84816168424"
},
{
"key": "nameAtManufacturer",
"value": "Black Leather Front Row Seat for Vehicle Model B"
},
{
"key": "jisCallDate",
"value": "2022-01-24T09:13:34"
Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions docs-kits/kits/Industry Core Kit/page_changelog.mdx
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ import Notice from './part_notice.mdx'

All notable changes to this Kit will be documented in this file.

## [1.1.1] - 2024-10-23

Compatible for **release 24.08**.

### Removed

- **Development View:**
- **Aspect Models:**
- Removed the *manufacturerPartId* in the key-value list of the localIdentifiers for the SerialPart, Batch and JustInsequencePart JSON-Example
- Replaced the faulty (production) country abbreviation in the JSON-Example of the Batch aspect model from *HUR* to *DEU*

## [1.1.0] - 2024-07-11

Compatible for **release 24.08**.
Expand Down
Loading