Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem: Restore don't work with snapshot revert usage #245

Merged

Conversation

yihuang
Copy link
Collaborator

@yihuang yihuang commented Apr 1, 2024

Solution:

  • fix and add test to support the usage pattern in ethermint

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

@yihuang yihuang requested a review from mmsqe April 1, 2024 08:35
@yihuang yihuang marked this pull request as draft April 1, 2024 08:55
@yihuang yihuang changed the title Problem: Restore don't work snapshot revert usage Problem: Restore don't work with snapshot revert usage Apr 1, 2024
Comment on lines +132 to +134
for _, store := range cms.stores {
store.Discard()
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +188 to +190
for k, v := range cms.stores {
stores[k] = v.(types.BranchStore).Clone().(types.CacheWrap)
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Comment on lines +207 to +212
for k, v := range cms.stores {
if _, ok := other.stores[k]; !ok {
// clear the cache store if it's not in the other
v.Discard()
}
}

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Iteration over map Warning

Iteration over map may be a possible source of non-determinism
Solution:
- fix and add test to support the usage pattern in ethermint

add Discard method to CacheWrap

better testing

reorder

fix bug
@yihuang yihuang merged commit ec314e8 into crypto-org-chain:release/v0.50.x Apr 2, 2024
43 of 45 checks passed
@yihuang yihuang deleted the cleanup-store-api branch April 2, 2024 02:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants