Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rubocop to a slightly less ancient version to allow us to use ruby-2.7 syntax #442

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

adamruzicka
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@adamruzicka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ofedoren not great, I admit, but I don't really have the determination to fix all gorillion cops that were added or changed since rubocop-0.39.0. On the brighter side, this should allow us to use the triple dot splat.

Copy link

@ofedoren ofedoren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @adamruzicka, love the changes :) The only question though:

require 'apipie-params'
require 'algebrick'
require 'thread'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to make sure, this isn't being used, is it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're using threads, but it seems to be auto-required. Or to put it the other way around, we don't seem to be using anything related to threads that we'd have to explicitly require

Copy link

@ofedoren ofedoren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @adamruzicka, LGTM :)

@adamruzicka adamruzicka merged commit 74335fb into Dynflow:master Jan 31, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@adamruzicka adamruzicka deleted the 2.7 branch January 31, 2024 13:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants