Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix discrepancy between 109 and 111 #793

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

ktsypkina
Copy link
Member

change "may" to stronger "should" for additional (unknown) properties described in #111 to be compliant with requirements from server described in #109

chapters/compatibility.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tfrauenstein
Copy link
Member

👍

Copy link
Member

@tkrop tkrop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ktsypkina I think we should also improve on rule 109. At the moment it is missing a similar sentence as in 111 about that APIs must document, if they deviates from the default rejection strategy. Can you add a sentence about this after the strict recommendation too?

chapters/compatibility.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@tkrop
Copy link
Member

tkrop commented Feb 6, 2024

👍

@ePaul
Copy link
Member

ePaul commented Feb 21, 2024

👍

1 similar comment
@ktsypkina
Copy link
Member Author

👍

@ktsypkina ktsypkina merged commit 35743b9 into main Feb 21, 2024
2 checks passed
@ktsypkina ktsypkina deleted the fix_discrepancy_between_two_rules branch February 21, 2024 12:26
@tkrop
Copy link
Member

tkrop commented Feb 21, 2024

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants