chore(TransactionFeedV2): Trigger haptic feedback when pending transactions turn to completed #6154
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## slava/feed-v2-no-more-transactions-toast #6154 +/- ##
============================================================================
+ Coverage 88.77% 88.82% +0.05%
============================================================================
Files 727 727
Lines 30791 30807 +16
Branches 5636 5328 -308
============================================================================
+ Hits 27334 27365 +31
+ Misses 3414 3399 -15
Partials 43 43
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
sviderock
changed the title
src/redux/migrations.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| const flattenedTransactions = Object.values( | ||
| state.transactions.transactionsByNetworkId | ||
| ).flat() as TokenTransaction[] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As transactionsByNetworkId were grouped by networkId - it should be safe to assume that Zerion can also return the same hash for two different networks, considering that it should return identical data to what we were getting with the previous data providers. I think I need to change the whole implementation of knownCompletedTransactionsHashes to maybe store keys like ${networkId}_${transactionHash} or an object just like transactionsByNetworkId but wanted to post this here to confirm. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes I think we should store just the first page with all networks combined.
But because we need to keep the old feed, this should be a new field in the reducer.
sviderock
changed the title
| useEffect( | ||
| function updateKnownCompletedTransactions() { | ||
| if (data?.transactions.length) { | ||
| dispatch(updateKnownCompletedTransactionsHashes(data.transactions)) | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| [data?.transactions] | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems we could skip this effect by reacting to the underlying RTK-Query API fetched action, within the transactions reducer, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jeanregisser Will investigate and get back to you on this!
src/redux/migrations.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| const flattenedTransactions = Object.values( | ||
| state.transactions.transactionsByNetworkId | ||
| ).flat() as TokenTransaction[] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes I think we should store just the first page with all networks combined.
But because we need to keep the old feed, this should be a new field in the reducer.
src/transactions/reducer.ts
Outdated
| @@ -22,11 +22,13 @@ interface State { | |||
| // feed instantly. | |||
| standbyTransactions: StandbyTransaction[] | |||
| transactionsByNetworkId: TransactionsByNetworkId | |||
| knownCompletedTransactionsHashes: string[] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could we use a new transactions field to store the first page (or last X newest items) from the new API?
Then we could avoid the need for knownCompletedTransactionsHashes and use selectors to derive what we need from it.
Then if we see a new transaction that's newer than the oldest item in the newest list of items, we can vibrate.
This would address this new field proposed here being an ever growing list of TX hashes. And would serve the purpose of showing cached data directly on app load.
Would this all work?
sviderock
force-pushed
the
slava/feed-v2-vibrate-on-success
branch
from
b6bb048
to
e2cf8ff
Compare
sviderock
changed the title
|
@jeanregisser The easiest way to remove the unnecessary redux changes in multiple files was just resetting the commits related to redux changes and force-pushing. I've updated this PR to only implement haptic for newly completed transactions. I'll add haptic for new unknown completed transactions as a follow-up PR to this PR as it implements |
Description
8th PR for RET-1207. Implements triggering of the haptic feedback when transactions turn from pending to completed.
Test plan
Added tests to validate the logic of triggering the haptic feedback
Related issues
Backwards compatibility
Yes
Network scalability
If a new NetworkId and/or Network are added in the future, the changes in this PR will: