Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: eth get prover data issues #24

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023
Merged

fix: eth get prover data issues #24

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 27, 2023

Conversation

atanmarko
Copy link
Member

Description

Fixed prover data retrieval issue related to:

  • creational transaction
  • account missing in storage

Fixes TP-645

PR Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added or updated tests that comprehensively prove my change is effective or that my feature works

@atanmarko atanmarko self-assigned this Jul 20, 2023
@atanmarko atanmarko marked this pull request as ready for review July 20, 2023 10:59
@atanmarko atanmarko requested a review from a team as a code owner July 20, 2023 10:59
@atanmarko atanmarko merged commit bfb007e into develop Jul 27, 2023
7 checks passed
@atanmarko atanmarko deleted the fix/eth_get_prover_data_issues branch July 27, 2023 16:25
atanmarko added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2023
@atanmarko
fix: eth get prover data issues (#24)
123eab8
atanmarko added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2023
@atanmarko
fix: eth get prover data issues (#24)
e32f415
atanmarko added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2023
@atanmarko
fix: eth get prover data issues (#24)
1bc41d0
atanmarko added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
@atanmarko
fix: eth get prover data issues (#24)
3cf0c90
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@hadjiszs hadjiszs hadjiszs approved these changes

@Freyskeyd Freyskeyd Awaiting requested review from Freyskeyd Freyskeyd is a code owner automatically assigned from topos-protocol/protocol

@JDawg287 JDawg287 Awaiting requested review from JDawg287 JDawg287 is a code owner automatically assigned from topos-protocol/protocol

@Nashtare Nashtare Awaiting requested review from Nashtare

Assignees

@atanmarko atanmarko

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@atanmarko @hadjiszs