don't namespace functions on step_dummy warnings

R/dummy.R

@@ -230,15 +230,15 @@ warn_new_levels <- function(dat, lvl, column, step, details = NULL) {
     if (any(is.na(lvl2))) {
       msg <- c(
         msg, 
-        "i" = "Consider using {.fn recipes::step_unknown} before \\
-        {.fn {step}} to handle missing values."
+        "i" = "Consider using {.help [step_unknown()](recipes::step_unknown)} \\
+        before {.fn {step}} to handle missing values."
       )
     }
     if (!all(is.na(lvl2))) {
       msg <- c(
         msg, 
-        "i" = "Consider using {.fn recipes::step_novel} before \\
-        {.fn {step}} to handle unseen values."
+        "i" = "Consider using {.help [step_novel()](recipes::step_novel)} \\ 
+        before {.fn {step}} to handle unseen values."
       )
     }
     msg <- c(msg, details)

tests/testthat/_snaps/dummy.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `city`: NA.
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_unknown()` before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
+      i Consider using step_unknown() (`?recipes::step_unknown()`) before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
 
 ---
 
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `city`: NA.
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_unknown()` before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
+      i Consider using step_unknown() (`?recipes::step_unknown()`) before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
 
 # tests for NA values in ordered factor
 
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `city`: NA.
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_unknown()` before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
+      i Consider using step_unknown() (`?recipes::step_unknown()`) before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
 
 ---
 
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `city`: NA.
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_unknown()` before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
+      i Consider using step_unknown() (`?recipes::step_unknown()`) before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
 
 # new levels
 
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `column`: C.
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_novel()` before `step_dummy()` to handle unseen values.
+      i Consider using step_novel() (`?recipes::step_novel()`) \ before `step_dummy()` to handle unseen values.
 
 ---
 
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `x1`: C.
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_novel()` before `step_dummy()` to handle unseen values.
+      i Consider using step_novel() (`?recipes::step_novel()`) \ before `step_dummy()` to handle unseen values.
     Output
       # A tibble: 10 x 2
          y      x1_B
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `a`: NA.
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_unknown()` before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
+      i Consider using step_unknown() (`?recipes::step_unknown()`) before `step_dummy()` to handle missing values.
 
 # Deprecation warning
 

tests/testthat/_snaps/unknown.md

@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
     Condition
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `city`: "WEST_SACRAMENTO".
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_novel()` before `step_unknown()` to handle unseen values.
+      i Consider using step_novel() (`?recipes::step_novel()`) \ before `step_unknown()` to handle unseen values.
       * New levels will be coerced to `NA` by `step_unknown()`.
       Warning:
       ! There are new levels in `zip`: "z95691".
-      i Consider using `recipes::step_novel()` before `step_unknown()` to handle unseen values.
+      i Consider using step_novel() (`?recipes::step_novel()`) \ before `step_unknown()` to handle unseen values.
       * New levels will be coerced to `NA` by `step_unknown()`.
 
 # bad args