Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GetTableRowsParams fixes, endianess for 256 key for RSDK and GetBlockResult deserialization #30

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

guilledk
Copy link

@guilledk guilledk commented Aug 1, 2024

No description provided.

@guilledk guilledk requested a review from poplexity August 1, 2024 22:48
@guilledk guilledk self-assigned this Aug 1, 2024
@guilledk guilledk mentioned this pull request Aug 1, 2024
@guilledk guilledk force-pushed the finish_table_rows_params branch 2 times, most recently from b38184d to 4a0ed13 Compare August 1, 2024 23:34
…ks for rscdk compiled contracts"

This reverts commit 6977b8b, in particular the endianness of Checksum256.
This is needed to be compatible with the C++ smart contracts compiler, while rscdk (Rust WASM compiler)
needs the commit that here is being reverted.

This means that going on antelope-rs will be compatible with the C++ smart contracts compiler and not with
the Rust compiler.
The test was meant to check the consistency of the Checksum256 encoding with the SNARKtor contracts and the WASM-compiled smart contracts in general. However, given that the `rscdk` compiler treats the encoding of Checksum256 with a different encoding compared to the C++ compiler, the test has been removed.
It could be restored once the `rscdk` issue is fixed.
@ptagl ptagl linked an issue Sep 11, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@poplexity poplexity merged commit 59f7e5c into development Sep 11, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants