Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update broken sample #2251

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2024
Merged

Update broken sample #2251

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

ntacheva
Copy link
Contributor

Update the code as it does not work in REPL due to the WebClient usage.

@ntacheva ntacheva added the merge-to-production Use this label to get a comment to choose whether to merge the PR to production label Jul 19, 2024
@ntacheva ntacheva self-assigned this Jul 19, 2024
@ntacheva ntacheva requested a review from a team as a code owner July 19, 2024 11:59
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @ntacheva,

Check the below option if you would like to automatically generate PR to production. The automation uses the branch for the cherry-pick, and then will delete the branch. Please, do not delete it manually.

  • create PR to production

@ntacheva ntacheva requested a review from a team July 19, 2024 12:01
@ntacheva ntacheva merged commit 0ebbb4d into master Jul 19, 2024
2 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

Here you are the link to your PR to production: 2253

@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the ntacheva-patch-2 branch July 19, 2024 13:57
NansiYancheva pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@ikoevska ikoevska left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merge-to-production Use this label to get a comment to choose whether to merge the PR to production
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants