Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(README): removes gotcha that sections wouldn't work #214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 5, 2024

Conversation

McMeadow
Copy link
Collaborator

@McMeadow McMeadow commented Jun 5, 2024

Description

  • removes gotcha that sections wouldn't work

Motivation and Context

ain't true anymore

How Has This Been Tested?

  • green ci

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Documentation only change
  • Refactor (non-breaking change which fixes an issue without changing functionality)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

  • 📖

    • My change doesn't require a documentation update, or ...
    • it does and I have updated it
  • ⚖️

    • The contribution will be subject to The MIT license, and I'm OK with that.
    • The contribution is my own original work.
    • I am ok with the stuff in CONTRIBUTING.md.

@McMeadow McMeadow requested a review from sverweij as a code owner June 5, 2024 07:17
@github-actions github-actions bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation vco labels Jun 5, 2024
@sverweij sverweij changed the title doc(README): removes gotcha that sections wouldn't work docs(README): removes gotcha that sections wouldn't work Jun 5, 2024
@sverweij sverweij merged commit 877c3d1 into main Jun 5, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@sverweij sverweij deleted the McMeadow-patch-1 branch June 5, 2024 07:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation vco
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants