Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ignore test_diff_management #1074

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

ignore test_diff_management #1074

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

plebhash
Copy link
Collaborator

@plebhash plebhash commented Jul 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

after some failed attempts on #995, this PR disables the test_diff_management unit test as a temporary fix to #988

we should not close #988 until a more sustainable fix is found for the long term

we should also be extra careful when modifying roles/translator/src/lib/downstream_sv1/diff_management.rs

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🐰Bencher

ReportWed, September 4, 2024 at 13:37:28 UTC
ProjectStratum V2 (SRI)
Branchignore-test_diff_management
Testbedsv2
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyLatency Results
nanoseconds (ns) | (Δ%)		Latency Lower Boundary
nanoseconds (ns) | (%)		Latency Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns) | (%)
client_sv2_handle_message_common✅ (view plot)44.76 (+0.32%)43.63 (97.47%)45.61 (98.14%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining✅ (view plot)75.86 (+2.33%)65.05 (85.75%)83.21 (91.17%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard✅ (view plot)14.66 (+0.02%)14.60 (99.56%)14.72 (99.60%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize✅ (view plot)268.86 (+0.88%)248.88 (92.57%)284.16 (94.62%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize✅ (view plot)604.43 (+1.70%)561.78 (92.94%)626.84 (96.43%)
client_sv2_open_channel✅ (view plot)166.10 (+0.05%)160.05 (96.36%)172.00 (96.57%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize✅ (view plot)268.05 (-4.55%)266.62 (99.47%)295.04 (90.85%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize✅ (view plot)372.64 (-1.26%)331.71 (89.02%)423.09 (88.07%)
client_sv2_setup_connection✅ (view plot)155.47 (-4.62%)151.15 (97.22%)174.87 (88.91%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize✅ (view plot)418.63 (-10.58%)416.94 (99.60%)519.35 (80.61%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize✅ (view plot)978.26 (-0.53%)896.65 (91.66%)1,070.32 (91.40%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🐰Bencher

ReportWed, September 4, 2024 at 13:37:32 UTC
ProjectStratum V2 (SRI)
Branchignore-test_diff_management
Testbedsv1
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkEstimated CyclesEstimated Cycles Results
estimated cycles | (Δ%)		Estimated Cycles Lower Boundary
estimated cycles | (%)		Estimated Cycles Upper Boundary
estimated cycles | (%)		InstructionsInstructions Results
instructions | (Δ%)		Instructions Lower Boundary
instructions | (%)		Instructions Upper Boundary
instructions | (%)		L1 AccessesL1 Accesses Results
accesses | (Δ%)		L1 Accesses Lower Boundary
accesses | (%)		L1 Accesses Upper Boundary
accesses | (%)		L2 AccessesL2 Accesses Results
accesses | (Δ%)		L2 Accesses Lower Boundary
accesses | (%)		L2 Accesses Upper Boundary
accesses | (%)		RAM AccessesRAM Accesses Results
accesses | (Δ%)		RAM Accesses Lower Boundary
accesses | (%)		RAM Accesses Upper Boundary
accesses | (%)
get_authorize✅ (view plot)8,428.00 (-0.17%)8,197.96 (97.27%)8,686.41 (97.03%)✅ (view plot)3,746.00 (-0.04%)3,652.42 (97.50%)3,842.39 (97.49%)✅ (view plot)5,253.00 (-0.05%)5,125.56 (97.57%)5,386.22 (97.53%)✅ (view plot)5.00 (-31.73%)4.61 (92.26%)10.04 (49.82%)✅ (view plot)90.00 (+0.01%)86.44 (96.04%)93.54 (96.21%)
get_submit✅ (view plot)95,341.00 (-0.16%)94,993.35 (99.64%)96,001.46 (99.31%)✅ (view plot)59,439.00 (-0.05%)59,238.78 (99.66%)59,703.30 (99.56%)✅ (view plot)85,371.00 (-0.05%)85,088.25 (99.67%)85,742.02 (99.57%)✅ (view plot)41.00 (-16.99%)34.81 (84.90%)63.97 (64.10%)✅ (view plot)279.00 (-0.72%)274.60 (98.42%)287.42 (97.07%)
get_subscribe✅ (view plot)8,021.00 (+0.23%)7,754.76 (96.68%)8,251.02 (97.21%)✅ (view plot)2,841.00 (+0.20%)2,744.56 (96.61%)2,926.11 (97.09%)✅ (view plot)3,971.00 (+0.19%)3,841.96 (96.75%)4,084.75 (97.22%)✅ (view plot)12.00 (-10.93%)6.77 (56.45%)20.17 (59.49%)✅ (view plot)114.00 (+0.45%)109.42 (95.98%)117.57 (96.97%)
serialize_authorize✅ (view plot)12,279.00 (+0.27%)11,979.77 (97.56%)12,512.27 (98.14%)✅ (view plot)5,317.00 (-0.03%)5,223.42 (98.24%)5,413.39 (98.22%)✅ (view plot)7,414.00 (-0.05%)7,287.56 (98.29%)7,548.55 (98.22%)✅ (view plot)7.00 (-26.89%)6.04 (86.26%)13.11 (53.39%)✅ (view plot)138.00 (+1.04%)131.98 (95.63%)141.17 (97.75%)
serialize_deserialize_authorize✅ (view plot)24,701.00 (+0.48%)24,236.77 (98.12%)24,929.20 (99.08%)✅ (view plot)9,868.00 (-0.31%)9,788.05 (99.19%)10,008.92 (98.59%)✅ (view plot)13,931.00 (-0.28%)13,807.93 (99.12%)14,131.83 (98.58%)✅ (view plot)33.00 (-7.76%)30.18 (91.46%)41.37 (79.76%)✅ (view plot)303.00 (+1.64%)289.38 (95.50%)306.86 (98.74%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_authorize✅ (view plot)30,360.00 (+0.41%)29,938.92 (98.61%)30,532.26 (99.44%)✅ (view plot)12,071.00 (-0.17%)11,994.53 (99.37%)12,189.17 (99.03%)✅ (view plot)17,095.00 (-0.14%)16,982.35 (99.34%)17,254.29 (99.08%)✅ (view plot)56.00 (-2.06%)50.31 (89.84%)64.04 (87.44%)✅ (view plot)371.00 (+1.20%)358.58 (96.65%)374.64 (99.03%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_submit✅ (view plot)126,494.00 (+0.03%)125,944.10 (99.57%)126,959.38 (99.63%)✅ (view plot)73,280.00 (+0.01%)72,989.22 (99.60%)73,553.60 (99.63%)✅ (view plot)105,059.00 (+0.02%)104,628.44 (99.59%)105,441.43 (99.64%)✅ (view plot)101.00 (-9.93%)91.93 (91.02%)132.34 (76.32%)✅ (view plot)598.00 (+0.35%)590.12 (98.68%)601.66 (99.39%)
serialize_deserialize_handle_subscribe✅ (view plot)28,012.00 (+1.30%)27,108.29 (96.77%)28,198.08 (99.34%)✅ (view plot)9,659.00 (+0.17%)9,548.75 (98.86%)9,737.17 (99.20%)✅ (view plot)13,662.00 (+0.16%)13,509.14 (98.88%)13,770.38 (99.21%)✅ (view plot)63.00 (-2.16%)56.64 (89.90%)72.14 (87.33%)✅ (view plot)401.00 (+2.51%)376.87 (93.98%)405.50 (98.89%)
serialize_deserialize_submit✅ (view plot)115,211.00 (+0.04%)114,669.57 (99.53%)115,663.72 (99.61%)✅ (view plot)68,057.00 (-0.04%)67,811.17 (99.64%)68,355.90 (99.56%)✅ (view plot)97,656.00 (-0.04%)97,292.35 (99.63%)98,105.39 (99.54%)✅ (view plot)60.00 (-7.76%)53.89 (89.81%)76.20 (78.74%)✅ (view plot)493.00 (+0.66%)484.06 (98.19%)495.52 (99.49%)
serialize_deserialize_subscribe✅ (view plot)23,409.00 (+1.43%)22,535.92 (96.27%)23,620.86 (99.10%)✅ (view plot)8,211.00 (+0.16%)8,102.42 (98.68%)8,292.69 (99.01%)✅ (view plot)11,564.00 (+0.15%)11,415.92 (98.72%)11,677.89 (99.02%)✅ (view plot)38.00 (-0.61%)33.57 (88.34%)42.89 (88.59%)✅ (view plot)333.00 (+2.77%)310.24 (93.17%)337.78 (98.59%)
serialize_submit✅ (view plot)99,798.00 (-0.09%)99,414.30 (99.62%)100,358.89 (99.44%)✅ (view plot)61,483.00 (-0.05%)61,279.84 (99.67%)61,750.79 (99.57%)✅ (view plot)88,213.00 (-0.05%)87,926.62 (99.68%)88,592.02 (99.57%)✅ (view plot)42.00 (-16.97%)37.88 (90.19%)63.29 (66.36%)✅ (view plot)325.00 (+0.01%)319.14 (98.20%)330.83 (98.24%)
serialize_subscribe✅ (view plot)11,418.00 (+0.35%)11,114.38 (97.34%)11,642.18 (98.07%)✅ (view plot)4,188.00 (+0.14%)4,091.56 (97.70%)4,273.11 (98.01%)✅ (view plot)5,828.00 (+0.13%)5,698.85 (97.78%)5,941.69 (98.09%)✅ (view plot)12.00 (-16.01%)9.19 (76.62%)19.38 (61.92%)✅ (view plot)158.00 (+0.79%)151.58 (95.94%)161.94 (97.57%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🐰Bencher

ReportWed, September 4, 2024 at 13:37:29 UTC
ProjectStratum V2 (SRI)
Branch1074/merge
Testbedsv1

🚨 1 ALERT: Threshold Boundary Limit exceeded!
BenchmarkMeasure (units)ViewValueLower BoundaryUpper Boundary
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserializeLatency (nanoseconds (ns))🚨 (view plot | view alert)666.77 (+7.37%)588.64 (88.28%)653.38 (102.05%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyLatency Results
nanoseconds (ns) | (Δ%)		Latency Lower Boundary
nanoseconds (ns) | (%)		Latency Upper Boundary
nanoseconds (ns) | (%)
client-submit-serialize✅ (view plot)6,967.20 (+1.59%)6,416.56 (92.10%)7,299.90 (95.44%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize✅ (view plot)8,020.30 (+2.52%)7,310.50 (91.15%)8,335.64 (96.22%)
client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-submit-serialize-deserialize-handle✅ (view plot)8,523.20 (+1.52%)7,953.19 (93.31%)8,838.05 (96.44%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize-handle✅ (view plot)931.70 (+2.62%)869.33 (93.31%)946.49 (98.44%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize-deserialize✅ (view plot)732.66 (+3.61%)675.97 (92.26%)738.36 (99.23%)
client-sv1-authorize-serialize/client-sv1-authorize-serialize✅ (view plot)253.86 (+1.93%)242.25 (95.43%)255.87 (99.22%)
client-sv1-get-authorize/client-sv1-get-authorize✅ (view plot)158.49 (+0.70%)152.52 (96.23%)162.25 (97.69%)
client-sv1-get-submit✅ (view plot)6,611.70 (-0.38%)6,203.14 (93.82%)7,070.22 (93.51%)
client-sv1-get-subscribe/client-sv1-get-subscribe✅ (view plot)277.79 (+0.31%)262.61 (94.54%)291.27 (95.37%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize-handle✅ (view plot)787.43 (+3.79%)719.92 (91.43%)797.43 (98.75%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize-deserialize🚨 (view plot | view alert)666.77 (+7.37%)588.64 (88.28%)653.38 (102.05%)
client-sv1-subscribe-serialize/client-sv1-subscribe-serialize✅ (view plot)210.14 (+1.14%)195.83 (93.19%)219.69 (95.65%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🐰Bencher

ReportWed, September 4, 2024 at 13:37:31 UTC
ProjectStratum V2 (SRI)
Branchignore-test_diff_management
Testbedsv2
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkEstimated CyclesEstimated Cycles Results
estimated cycles | (Δ%)		Estimated Cycles Lower Boundary
estimated cycles | (%)		Estimated Cycles Upper Boundary
estimated cycles | (%)		InstructionsInstructions Results
instructions | (Δ%)		Instructions Lower Boundary
instructions | (%)		Instructions Upper Boundary
instructions | (%)		L1 AccessesL1 Accesses Results
accesses | (Δ%)		L1 Accesses Lower Boundary
accesses | (%)		L1 Accesses Upper Boundary
accesses | (%)		L2 AccessesL2 Accesses Results
accesses | (Δ%)		L2 Accesses Lower Boundary
accesses | (%)		L2 Accesses Upper Boundary
accesses | (%)		RAM AccessesRAM Accesses Results
accesses | (Δ%)		RAM Accesses Lower Boundary
accesses | (%)		RAM Accesses Upper Boundary
accesses | (%)
client_sv2_handle_message_common✅ (view plot)2,107.00 (+1.70%)1,986.25 (94.27%)2,157.24 (97.67%)✅ (view plot)473.00 (+0.31%)459.53 (97.15%)483.53 (97.82%)✅ (view plot)732.00 (-0.17%)715.13 (97.69%)751.41 (97.42%)✅ (view plot)9.00 (+44.50%)0.44 (4.92%)12.01 (74.91%)✅ (view plot)38.00 (+1.73%)34.99 (92.07%)39.72 (95.67%)
client_sv2_handle_message_mining✅ (view plot)8,212.00 (+0.14%)8,093.01 (98.55%)8,307.58 (98.85%)✅ (view plot)2,137.00 (+0.20%)2,099.15 (98.23%)2,166.21 (98.65%)✅ (view plot)3,157.00 (+0.12%)3,099.06 (98.16%)3,207.43 (98.43%)✅ (view plot)38.00 (+3.61%)30.60 (80.52%)42.76 (88.88%)✅ (view plot)139.00 (+0.03%)136.54 (98.23%)141.38 (98.32%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard✅ (view plot)6,297.00 (+0.28%)6,185.12 (98.22%)6,373.96 (98.79%)✅ (view plot)1,750.00 (-0.01%)1,738.79 (99.36%)1,761.51 (99.35%)✅ (view plot)2,547.00 (-0.25%)2,535.32 (99.54%)2,571.38 (99.05%)✅ (view plot)22.00 (+27.13%)12.01 (54.60%)22.60 (97.35%)✅ (view plot)104.00 (+0.01%)101.42 (97.51%)106.57 (97.59%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize✅ (view plot)14,690.00 (-0.47%)14,552.72 (99.07%)14,966.35 (98.15%)✅ (view plot)4,694.00 (-0.00%)4,682.79 (99.76%)4,705.51 (99.76%)✅ (view plot)6,755.00 (-0.02%)6,739.38 (99.77%)6,773.69 (99.72%)✅ (view plot)47.00 (+4.75%)37.64 (80.09%)52.09 (90.23%)✅ (view plot)220.00 (-1.01%)216.45 (98.39%)228.04 (96.47%)
client_sv2_mining_message_submit_standard_serialize_deserialize✅ (view plot)27,476.00 (-0.12%)27,231.40 (99.11%)27,784.33 (98.89%)✅ (view plot)10,585.00 (+0.21%)10,514.55 (99.33%)10,610.80 (99.76%)✅ (view plot)15,401.00 (+0.20%)15,299.89 (99.34%)15,439.84 (99.75%)✅ (view plot)84.00 (+2.61%)75.78 (90.22%)87.95 (95.51%)✅ (view plot)333.00 (-0.63%)327.38 (98.31%)342.83 (97.13%)
client_sv2_open_channel✅ (view plot)4,337.00 (-2.21%)4,272.88 (98.52%)4,597.54 (94.33%)✅ (view plot)1,461.00 (+0.05%)1,449.36 (99.20%)1,471.23 (99.30%)✅ (view plot)2,162.00 (+0.29%)2,138.44 (98.91%)2,173.22 (99.48%)✅ (view plot)8.00 (-23.15%)5.16 (64.48%)15.66 (51.08%)✅ (view plot)61.00 (-4.15%)59.29 (97.20%)67.98 (89.73%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize✅ (view plot)13,948.00 (-1.31%)13,864.49 (99.40%)14,402.67 (96.84%)✅ (view plot)5,064.00 (+0.01%)5,052.36 (99.77%)5,074.23 (99.80%)✅ (view plot)7,328.00 (+0.08%)7,302.71 (99.65%)7,341.40 (99.82%)✅ (view plot)36.00 (+2.16%)29.43 (81.75%)41.05 (87.70%)✅ (view plot)184.00 (-2.94%)182.06 (98.95%)197.10 (93.35%)
client_sv2_open_channel_serialize_deserialize✅ (view plot)22,613.00 (-0.13%)22,362.61 (98.89%)22,922.23 (98.65%)✅ (view plot)8,027.00 (+0.29%)7,956.80 (99.13%)8,050.84 (99.70%)✅ (view plot)11,673.00 (+0.25%)11,574.18 (99.15%)11,713.42 (99.65%)✅ (view plot)81.00 (+10.17%)65.45 (80.80%)81.60 (99.26%)✅ (view plot)301.00 (-0.90%)295.82 (98.28%)311.66 (96.58%)
client_sv2_setup_connection✅ (view plot)4,673.00 (-0.34%)4,624.54 (98.96%)4,753.19 (98.31%)✅ (view plot)1,502.00 (+0.05%)1,490.36 (99.23%)1,512.23 (99.32%)✅ (view plot)2,278.00 (+0.05%)2,259.48 (99.19%)2,294.35 (99.29%)✅ (view plot)10.00 (+6.49%)4.87 (48.66%)13.92 (71.86%)✅ (view plot)67.00 (-0.85%)65.74 (98.11%)69.41 (96.53%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize✅ (view plot)16,118.00 (-0.58%)16,000.09 (99.27%)16,424.10 (98.14%)✅ (view plot)5,963.00 (+0.01%)5,951.36 (99.80%)5,973.23 (99.83%)✅ (view plot)8,663.00 (+0.04%)8,638.63 (99.72%)8,679.65 (99.81%)✅ (view plot)42.00 (+0.18%)32.70 (77.85%)51.15 (82.11%)✅ (view plot)207.00 (-1.34%)204.16 (98.63%)215.46 (96.07%)
client_sv2_setup_connection_serialize_deserialize✅ (view plot)35,572.00 (+0.07%)35,384.23 (99.47%)35,712.15 (99.61%)✅ (view plot)14,855.00 (+0.16%)14,783.28 (99.52%)14,879.31 (99.84%)✅ (view plot)21,817.00 (+0.15%)21,705.69 (99.49%)21,864.21 (99.78%)✅ (view plot)98.00 (+3.25%)79.72 (81.34%)110.11 (89.00%)✅ (view plot)379.00 (-0.18%)375.88 (99.18%)383.47 (98.83%)

Bencher - Continuous Benchmarking
View Public Perf Page
Docs | Repo | Chat | Help

@Fi3
Copy link
Collaborator

Fi3 commented Jul 27, 2024

Have you tried the values suggested here #988 (comment) ?

@plebhash plebhash mentioned this pull request Jul 27, 2024
Merged
@plebhash
Copy link
Collaborator Author

plebhash commented Jul 27, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Have you tried the values suggested here #988 (comment) ?

I did some investigation, which is described in detail here: #995 (comment)

my findings were:

  • measure_hashrate(X): no significant differences by either increasing or decreasing it (1s might seem better, but if this was significant, 30s would be significantly worse, which is not the case, so we just attribute that to luck and conclude this parameter is not important)
  • z_score_99: decreasing to 95% it made it significantly worse (which actually proves my previous suggestion was wrong), while increasing even further above 99.9999...% made no significant difference
  • total_run_time: increasing to 30s made the errors go away, while decreasing to 1s made it significantly worse, indicating this parameter is sensitive and increasing it seems to be the final solution to our problem

it seems your #988 (comment) suggests total_run_time = 40s, but only empirically tested on your machine

in summary, bigger values for total_run_time seems to always improve things, so maybe we can overshoot to 60s and hope it will fix this once and for all, which I'm now proposing via #1075

if we merge #1075 and have to re-open #988 again, then we should consider this PR, which completely disables test_diff_management

@plebhash
Copy link
Collaborator Author

reverting this to draft status in favor of #1075

@plebhash plebhash marked this pull request as draft July 27, 2024 22:46
@Fi3
Copy link
Collaborator

Fi3 commented Jul 29, 2024

Have you tried the values suggested here #988 (comment) ?

I did some investigation, which is described in detail here: #995 (comment)

my findings were:

  • measure_hashrate(X): no significant differences by either increasing or decreasing it (1s might seem better, but if this was significant, 30s would be significantly worse, which is not the case, so we just attribute that to luck and conclude this parameter is not important)
  • z_score_99: decreasing to 95% it made it significantly worse (which actually proves my previous suggestion was wrong), while increasing even further above 99.9999...% made no significant difference
  • total_run_time: increasing to 30s made the errors go away, while decreasing to 1s made it significantly worse, indicating this parameter is sensitive and increasing it seems to be the final solution to our problem

it seems your #988 (comment) suggests total_run_time = 40s, but only empirically tested on your machine

in summary, bigger values for total_run_time seems to always improve things, so maybe we can overshoot to 60s and hope it will fix this once and for all, which I'm now proposing via #1075

if we merge #1075 and have to re-open #988 again, then we should consider this PR, which completely disables test_diff_management

yep measure hashrate above 10s seems to not improve significantly anymore. Higher total run time seems to always improve 40s seems to be good enough 60 would be better, but is 20s more every time we run the test

@jbesraa
Copy link
Contributor

jbesraa commented Aug 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

from today #1001
https://github.com/stratum-mining/stratum/actions/runs/10367376596/job/28698638588?pr=1001

@Fi3
Copy link
Collaborator

Fi3 commented Aug 13, 2024

if we hit that only once in weeks I would leave it there as the advantage of having the test overtake the hassle of re run it very few time. Otherwise we can just remove it.

@Fi3
Copy link
Collaborator

Fi3 commented Aug 13, 2024

also why we have all those warnings in CI?

@GitGab19
Copy link
Collaborator

also why we have all those warnings in CI?

#1051
I will fix them asap, but before doing it, I need to know exactly how our branch structure will be. So I will fix them once we defined it. For now I could disable (temporarily) benches from CI since they are generating only false alarms

@plebhash plebhash marked this pull request as ready for review August 27, 2024 16:24
@plebhash plebhash mentioned this pull request Aug 27, 2024
Open
@plebhash plebhash changed the base branch from dev to main August 28, 2024 20:15
@GitGab19 GitGab19 added the ready-to-be-merged triggers auto rebase bot label Sep 2, 2024
@sri-auto-rebase-bot sri-auto-rebase-bot bot force-pushed the ignore-test_diff_management branch 2 times, most recently from cf7601d to 33c0faf Compare September 2, 2024 14:05
@pavlenex pavlenex force-pushed the ignore-test_diff_management branch 2 times, most recently from c57c5f2 to 8c4091e Compare September 4, 2024 09:08
@plebhash plebhash merged commit 708e5e4 into stratum-mining:main Sep 4, 2024
34 checks passed
@plebhash plebhash deleted the ignore-test_diff_management branch September 4, 2024 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@GitGab19 GitGab19 GitGab19 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ready-to-be-merged triggers auto rebase bot
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix flaky test downstream_sv1::diff_management::test::test_diff_management
4 participants
@plebhash @Fi3 @jbesraa @GitGab19