Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ACM-10801] Added Validating Webhook for Discovery #231

Merged

Conversation

dislbenn
Copy link
Contributor

@dislbenn dislbenn commented Apr 2, 2024

Description

Created a validating webhook to prevent the import-strategy annotation from being added to non ROSA cluster.

Related Issue

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ACM-10801

Changes Made

Implemented a webhook to prevent the non ROSA clusters from being imported automatically.

Screenshots (if applicable)

Add screenshots or GIFs that demonstrate the changes visually, if relevant.

Checklist

  • I have tested the changes locally and they are functioning as expected.
  • I have updated the documentation (if necessary) to reflect the changes.
  • I have added/updated relevant unit tests (if applicable).
  • I have ensured that my code follows the project's coding standards.
  • I have checked for any potential security issues and addressed them.
  • I have added necessary comments to the code, especially in complex or unclear sections.
  • I have rebased my branch on top of the latest main/master branch.

Additional Notes

Add any additional notes, context, or information that might be helpful for reviewers.

Reviewers

Tag the appropriate reviewers who should review this pull request. To add reviewers, please add the following line: /cc @reviewer1 @reviewer2

/cc @cameronmwall @ngraham20

Definition of Done

  • Code is reviewed.
  • Code is tested.
  • Documentation is updated.
  • All checks and tests pass.
  • Approved by at least one reviewer.
  • Merged into the main/master branch.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added dco-signoff: yes approved PR approval has been given labels Apr 2, 2024
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
@dislbenn dislbenn changed the title [ACM-10801] Add Validating Webhook for Discovery [ACM-10801] Added Validating Webhook for Discovery Apr 2, 2024
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
@dislbenn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dislbenn commented Apr 3, 2024

/retest

1 similar comment
@dislbenn
Copy link
Contributor Author

dislbenn commented Apr 3, 2024

/retest

var _ webhook.Defaulter = &DiscoveredCluster{}

// Default implements webhook.Defaulter so a webhook will be registered for the type
func (r *DiscoveredCluster) Default() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this doing anything?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just for setting the default setting of the webhook. No harm in just having this log for the moment, since this func can be enhanced at a later time.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
discoveredclusterLog.Info("default", "Name", r.Name)
}

var _ webhook.Validator = &DiscoveredCluster{}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is there a global variable that's not defined?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following the kubebuilder docs, they were adding that line when they were building the webhook: https://book.kubebuilder.io/multiversion-tutorial/webhooks.html#and-maingo. I checked out a few other repos that are configuring a webhook and they are using the same logic, so it might be best for us to remain consistent with the other projects/components.

Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Disaiah Bennett <[email protected]>
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 9, 2024

@ngraham20
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Apr 10, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 10, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dislbenn, ngraham20

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@dislbenn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override "KinD tests (1.21, latest)"

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 10, 2024

@dislbenn: Overrode contexts on behalf of dislbenn: KinD tests (1.21, latest)

In response to this:

/override "KinD tests (1.21, latest)"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 3643087 into stolostron:main Apr 10, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved PR approval has been given dco-signoff: yes lgtm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants