-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2091: renaming and moving DynKern to LFRicKern #2100
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2100 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 99.84% 99.85%
========================================
Files 349 349
Lines 47376 47206 -170
========================================
- Hits 47304 47138 -166
+ Misses 72 68 -4
☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
#2095 is now merged to master. I'd suggest updating this branch with the master, resolving conflicts and tidying up imports. Please also check the changes for |
…ors made when resolving merge conflicts
is applied without colouring
@arporter I think I spoke too soon there! I think all of the obvious stuff is fixed, and the checks are running through to the pytest part now. The confusing bit is that I have two test failures, neither of which are in files that use DynKern/LFRicKern:
this is mostly for myself to track where i'm at but also wondering if you or @TeranIvy have any insight? |
The second test failure looks as though the |
@arporter Fixed! back to you for hopefully final review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good now.
Just waiting on integration tests.
Hi @mo-lottieturner, I was going to make the minor changes myself but there are a few so I'm going to be good and ask you to do them (while the integration tests run). Then we can get this on. There are also a couple of Comments from previous reviews that haven't been addressed. |
Integration tests were all green :-) |
back to you @arporter |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All requested changes have been made.
Ref. guide still builds fine.
Will proceed to merge.
closes #2091