Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Meta SNIP for security council actions (part of the meta snip on security) #94

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

mattegoat
Copy link

Drafting the meta SNIP for Security Council as part of the Fête du SNIP

Part of Elias'PR

SNIPS/snip-template copy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SNIPS/snip-template copy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SNIPS/snip-template copy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SNIPS/snip-template copy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

- an L1 multisig
- Add a timelock to Starknet core contracts on L1 + the ability for the security council's multisig to bypass it (for phase 1)
- Add a pausable function only callable by the security council's multisig (for phase 2)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this approach doesn't fully make sense. Pausing should be an immediate action and going through a SC takes too long. A better approach is: give the pause button to a centralized entity, i.e. starkware foundation, and have the SC have the ability to unpause and revoke such permission if the foundation misbehaves. This is how it is implemented in OP Mainnet. It makes sense to do so since pausing is a reversible action

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree

@Eikix
Copy link
Collaborator

Eikix commented Jul 31, 2024

Changing this SNIP to become all actions encompassed by the Security Council

@Eikix Eikix changed the title draft meta snip for emergency actions (part of the meta snip on security) Meta SNIP for security council actions (part of the meta snip on security) Jul 31, 2024
@Eikix
Copy link
Collaborator

Eikix commented Aug 1, 2024

Closing this PR in favor of #93 since we merged all Security Council SNIPs into one

@Eikix Eikix closed this Aug 1, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 3, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants