Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

opt: speed up ReleaseTimeout() for multi-pool #332

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

panjf2000
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.72727% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.88%. Comparing base (95dad45) to head (05edbd0).

Files Patch % Lines
multipool.go 72.72% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
multipool_func.go 72.72% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #332      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.04%   90.88%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         804      834      +30     
==========================================
+ Hits          732      758      +26     
- Misses         50       51       +1     
- Partials       22       25       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 90.88% <72.72%> (-0.16%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@panjf2000 panjf2000 merged commit da22980 into dev Jun 17, 2024
11 of 13 checks passed
@panjf2000 panjf2000 deleted the multi-pool-opt branch June 17, 2024 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request optimization
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant