Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRDP-127] feat: Refactoring receipt-pdf-datastore generate PDF function into receipt-pdf-generator #2

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

svariant
Copy link
Collaborator

@svariant svariant commented Sep 5, 2023

List of Changes

Extracted the "GenerateReceiptPdf" & "MenageReceiptPoisonQueue" & "RetryReviewedPoisonMessagesProcessor" functions from receipt-pdf-datastore into this repository.

Motivation and Context

Issue PRDP-127
Needed for a better management of the resources used by the functions

How Has This Been Tested?

All previously present tests have been run

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@svariant svariant self-assigned this Sep 5, 2023
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: ['bug', 'enhancement', 'breaking-change', 'ignore-for-release']

@svariant svariant added enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Sep 5, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2023

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: [patch, minor, major, skip]

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2023

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: [patch, minor, major, skip]

@svariant svariant added major and removed size/large labels Sep 5, 2023
@svariant svariant marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2023 09:12
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2023

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 400 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 6, 2023

Comment this PR with update_code to update openapi.json and format the code. Consider to use pre-commit to format the code.

Copy link
Contributor

@pasqualespica pasqualespica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great work a lot of stuffs 🚀

@pasqualespica pasqualespica merged commit 554e0f3 into main Sep 6, 2023
9 of 14 checks passed
@pasqualespica pasqualespica temporarily deployed to dev September 6, 2023 13:27 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@pasqualespica pasqualespica temporarily deployed to dev September 6, 2023 13:28 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@pasqualespica pasqualespica temporarily deployed to dev September 6, 2023 13:30 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed major size/large
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants