Publish OSLC PROMCODE OS files under OSLC NS #307
Conversation
Date of line 35 was revised.
|
I have provided my latest comment here: #278 (comment) |
|
promcode-shapes.ttl and promcode.vocab.ttl files are updated on February 24, 2022. See the comment at #278 |
|
… 2022/02/18 0:57、Andrew Berezovskyi ***@***.***>のメール:
I have provided my latest comment here: #278 (comment) <#278 (comment)>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#307 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXJDHIQCYKU3IBMDSIPY7ZDU3ULIDANCNFSM5NQUP2BQ>.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
|
The change is to reflect the publication of version CS03.
The change is to reflect the publication of version CS03.
|
I ran ShapeChecker again on the lastest promcode-shapes.ttl and promcode-voca.ttl today (March 2, 2022). One warning generated which says that shapes.ttl does not refernce voca.ttl. Here is the result. Results from ShapeChecker run on Wed Mar 02 15:16:52 JST 2022 Command line arguments: A total of 1 issue was found (0 info, 1 warnings, 0 errors) Checked vocabulary file:/Users/tomkamimura/PROMCODE/oslc-promcode/PROMCODE/turtle_files/promcode-vocab.ttl from file:/Users/tomkamimura/PROMCODE/oslc-promcode/PROMCODE/turtle_files/promcode-vocab.ttl, with 0 issues (0 info, 0 warnings, 0 errors) Checked shapes from file:/Users/tomkamimura/PROMCODE/oslc-promcode/PROMCODE/build/install/ShapeChecker/../../../turtle_files/promcode-shapes.ttl, with 0 issues (0 info, 0 warnings, 0 errors) Warning: This vocabulary was given, but not referenced in the given shapes: |
|
We looked at our turtle files and our script to run ShapeCheck. There were some blank characters in places that may have caused a warning. Also, we changed parameters of the script to detect such blank characters. After fixing those blank characters, we ran the script and a warning is now gone. Here is the output of ShapeCheck. So, I think we are good now. I have modified the turtle files in the active PQ. @berezovskyi, will you please move ahead to get an agreement from oslc-ops? Command line arguments: A total of 0 issues were found (0 info, 0 warnings, 0 errors) Checked vocabulary file:/Users/tomkamimura/PROMCODE/oslc-promcode/PROMCODE/turtle_files/promcode-vocab.ttl from file:/Users/tomkamimura/PROMCODE/oslc-promcode/PROMCODE/turtle_files/promcode-vocab.ttl, with 0 issues (0 info, 0 warnings, 0 errors) Checked shapes from file:/Users/tomkamimura/PROMCODE/oslc-promcode/PROMCODE/build/install/ShapeChecker/../../../turtle_files/promcode-shapes.ttl, with 0 issues (0 info, 0 warnings, 0 errors) |
|
One more comment. We double checked our turtle files and confirmed the all the terms defined in vocab.ttl are referenced in shapes.ttl. You might think that a warning is gone because we added the parameter -q unusedVocabulary. We tested turtle files of QM that does not produce any warning. The script of Qm uses this parameter also. But, when we removed this parameter in the script of QM, it produced the same warning as the one we used to get. So, I don't know what causes a warning when the parameter unusedVocabulary is not used. At least, we can say that if there is a problem, QM probably has the same problem. In any case, the warning message produced by ShapeCheck does not seem accurate. |
berezovskyi
changed the title
|
@tomkamimura getting ready to merge and publish. Could you please check the files again, please? I saw on the lists that PROMCODE hit the OASIS Standard stage, but the files still say CS03. Should we change those to OS before publication? |
|
Andrew,
Thank you for your help. Yes, PROMCODE is now an OASIS standard, and that means that editorial change will be needed. I will check the files and will make necessary change before they are merged.
Tom Kamimura
… 2022/04/07 21:53、Andrew Berezovskyi ***@***.***>のメール:
@tomkamimura <https://github.com/tomkamimura> getting ready to merge and publish. Could you please check the files again, please? I saw on the lists that PROMCODE hit the OASIS Standard stage, but the files still say CS03. Should we change those to OS before publication?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#307 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXJDHIRBLXLYS44ENTVKDCTVD3LDNANCNFSM5NQUP2BQ>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
|
Replaced shapes.ttl and vocab.ttl files with the latest version reflecting OASIS Standard version.
|
Andrew, I have updated shapes.ttl and vocab.ttl files that rerflect the OASIS Standard version. |
|
Thanks @tomkamimura, I just regenerated all other formats and pushed them. I noticed that the date in the header is "11 March 2022", while in RDF it is "2022-02-02". Which one should it be? |
|
@berezovskyi , the correct date is March 11, 2022. I changed the wrong date in some files to 2022-03-11. |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Berezovskyi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Berezovskyi <[email protected]>
I have modified promcode-shapes.ttl and promcode-vocab.ttl files per the comments of Andrew and Jim.