Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update workload-params to json format and add nightly runs for zstd_no_dict codec type #3723

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2023

Conversation

rishabh6788
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

This PR adds:

  1. Update WORKLOAD_PARAMS to be of json type.
  2. nightly runs for zstd_no_dict index codec type for min distribution.

Issues Resolved

List any issues this PR will resolve, e.g. Closes [...].

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3723 (a6b82dd) into main (2613d45) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head a6b82dd differs from pull request most recent head 507208d. Consider uploading reports for the commit 507208d to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3723   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.54%   91.54%           
=======================================
  Files         182      182           
  Lines        5420     5420           
=======================================
  Hits         4962     4962           
  Misses        458      458           

@rishabh6788 rishabh6788 changed the title Update workload-params to json format and add nightly runs for zstd_no_dict code type Update workload-params to json format and add nightly runs for zstd_no_dict codec type Jul 10, 2023
@rishabh6788 rishabh6788 merged commit 2ade8b3 into opensearch-project:main Jul 10, 2023
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants