adding trophic relations for issue 647

[diatomsRcool]

I've added "symbiotrophically interacts with" and "trophic parasite of" as mentioned in #647 . I'm a little concerned about collisions with "acquires nutrients from". Also shouldn't all the "eats" and "is eaten by" be filed away under the "acquires nutrients from" and "provides nutrients for"?

[anitacaron]

Hi @diatomsRcool, are you using Protégé to create new terms?

Could you please update the annotations to use the one from dc-terms http://purl.org/dc/terms/ instead of dc-elements http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/?

This is the reason the QC is failing.

Let me know if you need help updating the annotations locally.

[diatomsRcool]

having trouble with protege.....not sure if this worked

[diatomsRcool]

ok, fixed - I think

[anitacaron]

It's good. All QC passed! Thanks, @diatomsRcool

[wdduncan]

@anitacaron Do you want to update the branch? It says it is out of date.

[cmungall]

Can merge once example is added as per @cthoyt's request

[github-actions]

This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update.

[jhpoelen]

@anitacaron to resolve conversations, approve, and merge pull request.

[anitacaron]

Technically approved. Still need to have an ontology review.

[github-actions]

This PR has not seen any activity in 90 days and has been marked as stale. If it is no longer needed, please close the PR. Otherwise, please update the PR with a status update.