Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update readme and check project against 23.10 #4

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 3, 2024

Conversation

guillaume-haerinck
Copy link
Contributor

First take on an unified readme format used accross every O3DE samples (and checked that the project still runs correctly on the release of 23.10.3)

The goal being to make the samples more accessible to the users. Both by updating the project's readme, adding a version check and linking them in O3DE showcase and doc pages. Task tracked via this issue : o3de/o3de.org#2549

@guillaume-haerinck
Copy link
Contributor Author

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@

set(ENABLED_GEMS
Buongiorno
Atom
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The correct gem name is below, had to remove this unused one to prevent a warning when registering project

Signed-off-by: guillaume-haerinck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: guillaume-haerinck <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@Ulrick28 Ulrick28 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving. I did notice that the repo has 2 of the same license files. As a separate PR we will want to investigate if we should remove one of them to alleviate confusion, unless the second license file is absolutely required for some reason.

@Ulrick28 Ulrick28 merged commit 01d9f2d into o3de:main Jun 3, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants