Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Limma mixed models feature #6753
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Limma mixed models feature #6753
Changes from 2 commits
9795e09
2f217b0
bc5d128
96fc5e1
2dcfb12
f557caa
2e008b0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This multi-package thing still creates difficulties right now- which is why I wrote this module depending on a single Biocontainer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Limma is a dependency of edger, you don't need to include it here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is true however without this we won't be able to control limma version which will be used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We only pin the primary dependency in the modules repo, unless you have a really compelling reason to do otherwise. We will at some point have lock files that pin all dependencies.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(as in other comments, I'm not sure we need edgeR here, so we'd only pin Limma)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well we noticed that results are slightly different depending on limma versions so we decided to pin it to achieve reproducibility. I will adopt your comment in standalone module
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I see your point on this one, apologies. Limma is the primary dependency so it's pinned, but we need edgeR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we shouldn't have any oras protocol in the modules, it doesn't work with NXF_SINGULARITY_CACHEDIR
Can you swittch to https?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These oras links don't work well with nf-core tooling right now, unfortunately
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I pulled and pushed to quay.io
So we can change the registry from all container in a simpler way.
We'll be using
community.wave.seqera.io
as registry when we do the switchThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not keen on this @maxulysse, there's no way for someone without privilege to do this and maintain the module.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not massively keen on the parallel script.
Either the new thing should be a separate module, or they should be properly integrated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How you envision "proper" integration? As single template? I will refactor that if needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I mean, if the two scripts share enough logic, they should be one with a simple conditional. If the logic is quite divergent such that doing that adds too much complexity, these should be separate modules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well I had similar doubts in the one hand this is still limma and differential abundance analysis and on the other site this one is combined with voom and there is lot of differences. So maybe we will create new module named limma/differential-voom? or simply limma/voom - what are your thoughts on the module naming?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be limma/differential-voom.
As in the comments below, I also think this should be, as much as possible, a thin wrapper around Limma functions only. Otherwise it's just your custom script, rather than a 'standard' Limma module.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updating this older comment after newer ones below: I don't believe additional logic required for Voom merits its own module. We can add the Voom part in a conditional, and other changes (e.g. duplicateCorrelation) etc, apply equally to non-Voom Limma.