Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tutorial updates #17

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2017
Merged

Tutorial updates #17

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2017

Conversation

larkin
Copy link
Contributor

@larkin larkin commented Jul 21, 2017

Some updates based on revisions to openmct APIs.

@@ -20,22 +18,11 @@ function RealtimeTelemetryPlugin() {
return domainObject.type === 'example.telemetry';
},
subscribe: function (domainObject, callback, options) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@larkin The options argument is no longer needed since the recent changes to the telemetry API doesn't require it.

router.ws('/', function (ws) {
var unlisten = spacecraft.listen(notifySubscribers);
subscribed = {}, // Active subscriptions for this connection
handlers = { // Handlers for specific requests
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@larkin var is missing at line 9.

@larkin
Copy link
Contributor Author

larkin commented Oct 2, 2017

@psarram this looks good. When we merge this we also have to update tags for the steps. Can you merge locally, generate new tags, and push new master + new tags together?

@larkin larkin mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2017
Simplify realtime provider

Due to nasa/openmct#1594 we no longer need
to worry about multiple calls for the same identifier.

Host all routes on same port, use host-relative urls for client

Update readme
@psarram psarram merged commit b1c24b4 into master Oct 17, 2017
@larkin larkin deleted the tutorial-updates branch March 8, 2018 23:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants