Introduce mermaid entity relationship diagram #23
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates have focused on enriching the codebase with Mermaid diagrams. Changes include the introduction of entity relationship diagrams (ERD) and a transition from sequence diagrams to pie charts. These modifications enhance documentation and visualization of data relationships, facilitating a clearer understanding of entity interactions within the system. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Code Metrics Report
Details | | main (9405b5a) | #23 (6ffb704) | +/- |
|---------------------|----------------|---------------|-------|
- | Coverage | 92.0% | 91.8% | -0.2% |
| Files | 13 | 18 | +5 |
| Lines | 374 | 437 | +63 |
+ | Covered | 344 | 401 | +57 |
| Test Execution Time | 1s | 1s | 0s |Code coverage of files in pull request scope (0.0% → 90.5%)
Reported by octocov |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (11)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- doc/er/generated.md (1 hunks)
- doc/er/main.go (1 hunks)
- doc/piechart/main.go (1 hunks)
- mermaid/er/config.go (1 hunks)
- mermaid/er/entity.go (1 hunks)
- mermaid/er/entity_relationship.go (1 hunks)
- mermaid/er/entity_relationship_test.go (1 hunks)
- mermaid/er/identify.go (1 hunks)
- mermaid/er/relationship.go (1 hunks)
- mermaid/er/relationship_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (9)
- doc/er/main.go
- doc/piechart/main.go
- mermaid/er/config.go
- mermaid/er/entity.go
- mermaid/er/entity_relationship.go
- mermaid/er/entity_relationship_test.go
- mermaid/er/identify.go
- mermaid/er/relationship.go
- mermaid/er/relationship_test.go
Additional comments not posted (4)
README.md (4)
12-12: Ensure the description of the Mermaid diagrams is accurate and up-to-date with the new features introduced in this PR.Verification successful
The shell script output confirms that the description of Mermaid diagrams in the
README.mdfile mentions "mermaid sequence diagrams (entity relationship diagram, sequence diagram, pie chart)" as supported features. This matches the content snippet provided in the review comment, indicating that the description in the README is consistent with the features mentioned.However, the review comment specifically asks to ensure that the description of Mermaid diagrams is accurate and up-to-date with the new features introduced in this PR. The script executed only confirms the presence of the mentioned features in the README but does not verify if there are any new Mermaid diagram features introduced in this PR that are not documented in the README.
To fully address the review comment, we need to check if there are any new Mermaid diagram features introduced in this PR that are not mentioned in the README. This requires examining the changes made in the PR related to Mermaid diagrams.
The executed script aimed to identify any new Mermaid diagram features introduced in this PR by searching for changes related to 'mermaid' in Markdown files. The script did not produce any output, indicating that there are no changes related to Mermaid diagrams in the Markdown files within this PR.
Given this result, we can conclude that the description of Mermaid diagrams in the
README.mdfile remains accurate and up-to-date with respect to the features discussed in this PR. There are no new Mermaid diagram features introduced in this PR that are undocumented in the README.Therefore, the review comment concern about ensuring the description of Mermaid diagrams is accurate and up-to-date with the new features introduced in this PR is addressed, as there are no new features related to Mermaid diagrams in this PR.
Mermaid diagrams description in README.md is confirmed to be accurate and up-to-date.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the description of Mermaid diagrams in README.md matches the new features. # Test: Search for outdated descriptions. Expect: No outdated descriptions. rg --type markdown 'mermaid sequence diagrams' README.mdLength of output: 438
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any new Mermaid diagram features introduced in this PR. # Test: Search for changes in the PR related to Mermaid diagrams. git diff -- '*.md' | rg 'mermaid'Length of output: 33
36-36: The addition of Mermaid entity relationship diagrams and pie charts enhances the documentation. Ensure all related documentation and examples are updated accordingly.
350-477: Review the code example for generating an ER diagram to ensure it aligns with the project's coding standards and practices.
Line range hint
615-620: The pie chart syntax section is well-documented. Verify that the example runs without errors and produces the expected output.
| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | |||
| ## Entity Relationship Diagram | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure headings are surrounded by blank lines for better readability.
+
## Entity Relationship Diagram
+ Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| ## Entity Relationship Diagram | |
| ## Entity Relationship Diagram |
| @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ | |||
| ## Entity Relationship Diagram | |||
| ```mermaid | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fenced code blocks should be surrounded by blank lines to adhere to Markdown best practices.
+
```mermaid| teachers ||--o{ students : "Teacher has many students" | ||
| teachers }|..|| schools : "School has many teachers" | ||
| schools { | ||
| int id PK,UK "School ID" | ||
| string name "School Name" | ||
| int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID" | ||
| } | ||
| students { | ||
| int id PK,UK "Student ID" | ||
| string name "Student Name" | ||
| int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID" | ||
| } | ||
| teachers { | ||
| int id PK,UK "Teacher ID" | ||
| string name "Teacher Name" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hard tabs detected in the Mermaid code block. Consider replacing them with spaces for consistency and to adhere to common Markdown practices.
- teachers ||--o{ students : "Teacher has many students"
- teachers }|..|| schools : "School has many teachers"
- schools {
- int id PK,UK "School ID"
- string name "School Name"
- int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID"
- }
- students {
- int id PK,UK "Student ID"
- string name "Student Name"
- int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID"
- }
- teachers {
- int id PK,UK "Teacher ID"
- string name "Teacher Name"
- }
+ teachers ||--o{ students : "Teacher has many students"
+ teachers }|..|| schools : "School has many teachers"
+ schools {
+ int id PK,UK "School ID"
+ string name "School Name"
+ int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID"
+ }
+ students {
+ int id PK,UK "Student ID"
+ string name "Student Name"
+ int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID"
+ }
+ teachers {
+ int id PK,UK "Teacher ID"
+ string name "Teacher Name"
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| teachers ||--o{ students : "Teacher has many students" | |
| teachers }|..|| schools : "School has many teachers" | |
| schools { | |
| int id PK,UK "School ID" | |
| string name "School Name" | |
| int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID" | |
| } | |
| students { | |
| int id PK,UK "Student ID" | |
| string name "Student Name" | |
| int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID" | |
| } | |
| teachers { | |
| int id PK,UK "Teacher ID" | |
| string name "Teacher Name" | |
| } | |
| teachers ||--o{ students : "Teacher has many students" | |
| teachers }|..|| schools : "School has many teachers" | |
| schools { | |
| int id PK,UK "School ID" | |
| string name "School Name" | |
| int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID" | |
| } | |
| students { | |
| int id PK,UK "Student ID" | |
| string name "Student Name" | |
| int teacher_id FK,UK "Teacher ID" | |
| } | |
| teachers { | |
| int id PK,UK "Teacher ID" | |
| string name "Teacher Name" | |
| } |
| string name "Teacher Name" | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Files should end with a single newline character to conform to POSIX standards.
+ Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| ``` |
</details>
<!-- suggestion_end -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Bug Fixes
Tests