Use an io.ReadSeeker instead of an io.Reader to parse feeds #2445
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fguillot
reviewed
Mar 5, 2024
This will allow to make use of `func (*Reader) Seek`, instead of re-recreating a new reader. It's a large commit for a small change, but anything to simply the reader/buffer/ReadAll/… mess is a step in the right direction I think, and it should enabled more follow-up simplifications.
|
There are some conflicts in |
2 tasks
|
Superseded by #2459 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will allow to make use of
func (*Reader) Seek, instead of re-recreating a new reader. It's a large commit for a small change, but anything to simply the reader/buffer/ReadAll/… mess is a step in the right direction I think, and it should enable more follow-up simplifications.