phase 2.

[mattzcarey]

draft for vis

[github-actions]

4/5 - Improve error handling and naming conventions

More details

File Path

/home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/src/common/remote/github/GitHubRESTClient.ts

Score

4/5 (lower is better)

Review

1. Consider error handling for failed API requests.
2. Improve the naming convention for functions and variables for better readability and clarity.

4/5 - Secure sensitive data like 'secretKey'

More details

File Path

/home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/src/test/cases/.cache/faee919bf4f6a5b85a44b1a8eacc0ca24223d6c4033a2b4c52bc79bb8e1bc1bb.ts

Score

4/5 (lower is better)

Review

Suggestions for .cache file:

1. Avoid hardcoding sensitive data like 'secretKey' directly in the code.
2. Secure 'secretKey' by using environment variables or secret management systems.
3. Encrypt 'secretKey' if it needs to be stored directly in code.
4. Ensure sensitive information is never exposed in source code.

5/5 - Flag potential security risk in apiKey field

More details

File Path

/home/runner/work/code-review-gpt/code-review-gpt/src/common/model/AIModel.ts

Score

5/5 (lower is better)

Review

• Flag the apiKey field as a potential security risk. Consider using environment variables for API keys.

---

Powered by Code Review GPT

[mattzcarey]

closes #336

[github-actions]

Test results summary:

⚠️ [WARN] - Test case: Bad variable name
✅ [PASS] - Test case: Exposed secret
✅ [PASS] - Test case: Unawaited Promise
⚠️ [WARN] - Test case: Too many nested loops

SUMMARY: ✅ PASS: 2 - ⚠️ WARN: 2 - ❌ FAIL: 0

---

Tests Powered by Code Review GPT