Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rb/foundry upgradeability refactoring #556

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 9, 2022

Conversation

RiccardoBiosas
Copy link
Contributor

What does this pull request do? Explain your changes. (required)
The current Foundry tests include a lot of repeating logic and code duplication, the PR addresses the issue by moving all the shared interfaces under a single directory and by creating a shared base test contract to encapsulate the governor logic used by other contracts/tests

Specific updates (required)

Refactored all the Foundry tests

How did you test each of these updates (required)
Run the the entire hardhat test suite (yarn test) and the foundry tests

Does this pull request close any open issues?
Refactor Foundry tests

Checklist:

  • README and other documentation updated
  • All tests using yarn test pass

…balTotalSupplyFix, fixed MinterGlobalTotalSupplyFix upgrade function
@yondonfu yondonfu requested review from 0xcadams and red-0ne May 6, 2022 20:49
@RiccardoBiosas RiccardoBiosas force-pushed the rb/foundry-upgradeability-refactoring branch from 96c9fc5 to e2152f5 Compare June 3, 2022 08:51
Copy link
Contributor

@kautukkundan kautukkundan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM ✅

@RiccardoBiosas RiccardoBiosas merged commit 7c51ea4 into confluence Jun 9, 2022
@hjpotter92 hjpotter92 deleted the rb/foundry-upgradeability-refactoring branch February 2, 2024 03:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants