Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor box libfuncs to use the BlockExt trait #521

Open
edg-l opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Refactor box libfuncs to use the BlockExt trait #521

edg-l opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
difficulty-easy good first issue Good for newcomers libfuncs Library Function implementations

Comments

@edg-l
Copy link
Member

edg-l commented Apr 18, 2024

See: #518

Refactor the code implementing the libfuncs to use the trait methods from BlockExt.

@edg-l edg-l added good first issue Good for newcomers libfuncs Library Function implementations odhack labels Apr 18, 2024
@edg-l edg-l changed the title Refactor box libfuncs to use the BlockExt trait #520 Open edg-l opene Refactor box libfuncs to use the BlockExt trait Apr 18, 2024
@Gerson2102
Copy link
Contributor

Gerson2102 commented Apr 22, 2024

Pls assign this to me, in case is not possible to refactor bitwise. Since the functions that can be refactored according to the PR that is related to the BlockExt trait, they are not in bitwise.

@FeliGR
Copy link

FeliGR commented Apr 23, 2024

Hello @edg-l,

I noticed that @gerson initially asked about this issue. I've reviewed the details and understand the task. If he chooses not to pursue it further, I would be interested in working on this. Could you kindly assign it to me if it becomes available?

@Gerson2102
Copy link
Contributor

Pls assign this to @FeliGR

@vibenedict
Copy link

i will like to jump on it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
difficulty-easy good first issue Good for newcomers libfuncs Library Function implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants