feat: custom-counter-arrows-in-number-field #55
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/examples/form.tsx (1)
31-31: LGTM: New number Field component without icon.The new Field component is correctly implemented with the "number" type, aligning with the PR objectives. The placeholder is appropriately set to "Number".
To improve code readability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of having two similar number fields (one with an icon and one without) and how they differ in functionality or use case.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/assets/svgs/arrows/field-arrow-down.svgis excluded by!**/*.svgsrc/assets/svgs/arrows/field-arrow-up.svgis excluded by!**/*.svg
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/examples/form.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/form/field.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/examples/form.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM: New import statement for Telegram icon.The import statement for the Telegram SVG icon is correctly formatted and appropriately placed in the file.
30-30: LGTM: New number Field component with Telegram icon.The new Field component is correctly implemented with the "number" type, aligning with the PR objectives. The placeholder is appropriately set to "Number".
However, could you please clarify the purpose of using the Telegram icon in this number field? It wasn't mentioned in the PR objectives and its relevance to a number input is not immediately clear.
To ensure the Telegram icon is being used correctly, let's check its usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Telegram icon usage is consistent across the codebase.
The
Icon={Telegram}is utilized in other components likeButton, indicating a deliberate and consistent design choice. No issues found regarding its usage in the newFieldcomponent.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of Telegram icon in Field components rg --type typescript --type tsx 'Field.*Icon={Telegram}' -g '!src/examples/form.tsx'Length of output: 204
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected script to check usage of Telegram icon in Field components rg --type typescript --type tsx 'Icon\s*=\s*\{Telegram\}' -g '!src/examples/form.tsx'Length of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected script to check usage of Telegram icon in Field components rg --type ts --type tsx 'Icon\s*=\s*\{Telegram\}' -g '!src/examples/form.tsx'Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Corrected script to check usage of Telegram icon in Field components using glob patterns rg 'Icon\s*=\s*\{Telegram\}' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '!src/examples/form.tsx'Length of output: 157
src/lib/form/field.tsx (1)
208-241: LGTM: Implementation of custom counter arrowsThe addition of custom increment and decrement buttons for number inputs enhances the user experience by providing intuitive controls that appear on hover. The use of
useRefanduseHoveris appropriate and correctly implemented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/lib/form/field.tsx (2)
87-102: LGTM: Updated StyledInput for custom arrowsThe changes to StyledInput are well-implemented and necessary for the custom arrows functionality. The padding-right logic and the removal of default browser arrows for number inputs are consistent with the PR objectives.
Minor suggestion for readability:
Consider extracting the padding-right logic into a separate function for better readability:
const getPaddingRight = ({ Icon, variant, type }) => { if (Icon) return type === "number" ? "64px" : "56px"; if (variant) return type === "number" ? "52px" : "44px"; return type === "number" ? "30px" : "16px"; }; // Then in StyledInput: padding-right: ${getPaddingRight};This change would make the component definition cleaner and easier to maintain.
206-224: LGTM: Well-implemented custom arrows for number inputsThe conditional rendering of custom arrows for number inputs and the implementation of increment and decrement functionality using stepUp and stepDown methods are well done. This aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.
Minor suggestion for improved accessibility:
Consider adding
aria-labelattributes to the increment and decrement buttons to improve screen reader support:<ArrowButton + aria-label="Increment value" onClick={() => inputRef?.current?.stepUp()} > <StyledArrowIcon as={UpArrowIcon} /> </ArrowButton> <ArrowButton + aria-label="Decrement value" onClick={() => inputRef?.current?.stepDown()} > <StyledArrowIcon as={DownArrowIcon} /> </ArrowButton>This change would enhance the accessibility of the custom arrows.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/lib/form/field.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/lib/form/field.tsx (6)
1-1: LGTM: New imports for custom arrows functionalityThe added imports (useRef, UpArrowIcon, DownArrowIcon, useHover) are necessary and correctly placed for implementing the new custom arrows functionality in number fields.
Also applies to: 7-8, 11-11
106-122: LGTM: Well-implemented ArrowsContainerThe ArrowsContainer styled component is well-implemented and correctly positioned based on the presence of Icon and variant props. This implementation aligns with the PR objectives for custom styling of number field arrows.
124-138: LGTM: Well-designed ArrowButton componentThe ArrowButton styled component is well-designed and implements the desired functionality as per the PR objectives. The unobtrusive styling and hover effect provide a good user experience.
140-146: LGTM: Consistent StyledArrowIcon stylingThe StyledArrowIcon styled component is well-implemented and consistent with the overall design. It provides the necessary styling for the custom arrow icons.
201-205: LGTM: Proper use of refs and hover detectionThe addition of useRef hooks for the wrapper and input elements, along with the useHover hook for hover detection, is well-implemented. This approach follows React best practices and is necessary for the new custom arrows functionality.
Line range hint
1-243: Overall assessment: Well-implemented custom arrows featureThe implementation of custom counter arrows for number fields in the Field component is well-executed and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. The code is clean, readable, and follows React best practices. The new functionality enhances the user interface by providing a more visually appealing and less intrusive interaction for number inputs.
Key points:
- Proper use of React hooks (useRef, useHover) for managing component state and interactions.
- Well-structured styled components for arrows container and buttons.
- Correct implementation of increment/decrement functionality using stepUp/stepDown methods.
- Conditional rendering ensures arrows are only shown when appropriate.
The minor suggestions provided in the review comments (extracting padding-right logic and improving accessibility) would further enhance the code quality and user experience.
Great job on this feature implementation!
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/form/field.tsx (1)
87-102: Consider simplifying the padding logic.The padding logic for
StyledInputhas been updated to accommodate the new arrow buttons, which is necessary. However, the current implementation might be a bit complex to read and maintain. Consider refactoring this logic into a separate function for better readability and maintainability.For example:
const getPaddingRight = ({ Icon, variant, type }) => { if (type === "number") { if (Icon) return "64px"; if (variant) return "52px"; return "30px"; } if (Icon) return "56px"; if (variant) return "44px"; return "16px"; }; // Then in the styled component: padding-right: ${(props) => getPaddingRight(props)};This approach would make the logic easier to understand and modify in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/lib/form/field.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/lib/form/field.tsx (7)
1-1: LGTM: New imports and styled components for custom counter arrows.The new imports and styled components align well with the PR objectives. The
ArrowsContainer,ArrowButton, andStyledArrowIconcomponents are well-structured and consistent with the existing styling patterns. The hover effect onArrowButtonenhances user experience.Also applies to: 7-8, 11-11, 106-149
205-207: LGTM: Efficient implementation of hover detection.The addition of refs for the wrapper and input elements, along with the use of the
useHoverhook, provides an efficient way to implement the hover detection for showing the custom arrows. This approach aligns well with the PR objectives.
212-227: LGTM: Correct implementation of custom counter arrows.The conditional rendering of arrow buttons for number inputs when hovering is well-implemented. The use of
stepUpandstepDownmethods via refs is appropriate for incrementing and decrementing the value.It's good to see that the
onClickhandler for the decrement button is now correctly placed on theArrowButton, addressing the issue raised in a previous review comment.
110-117: LGTM: Improved arrow button layout.Great job implementing the suggestions from the previous review. The 4px gap between arrow buttons and the centered layout with 100% height improve usability, especially on mobile devices. These changes address the concerns raised by alcercu in the past review comment.
126-141: LGTM: Improved arrow button styling.Excellent work on implementing the styling suggestions for the
ArrowButton. The square shape with a border-radius is now consistent with the overall design of the component, as suggested by alcercu in the previous review. The hover effect adds a nice touch to the user experience.
143-149: LGTM: Well-structured arrow icon styling.The
StyledArrowIconcomponent is a good addition. It provides consistent styling for the arrow icons and allows for easy customization. The use of the theme for the fill color ensures consistency with the overall design system.
204-246: LGTM: Successful implementation of custom counter arrows.The changes to the
Fieldcomponent successfully implement the custom counter arrows for number inputs, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. Key improvements include:
- Efficient hover detection using the
useHoverhook.- Conditional rendering of custom arrows for number inputs.
- Improved styling and layout of arrow buttons, addressing previous review comments.
- Consistent styling with the overall design system.
The implementation is well-structured, maintainable, and enhances the user experience, especially for number inputs. Great job on addressing all the major concerns from previous reviews and delivering a polished feature.
Fieldis oftypeofnumberPR-Codex overview
This PR introduces enhancements to the
Formcomponent by adding a newFieldthat uses aTelegramicon and implements number input functionality with increment and decrement buttons. It also includes SVG assets for arrow icons and updates styling for better usability.Detailed summary
TelegramSVG insrc/examples/form.tsx.FieldwithTelegramicon inForm.Field.src/lib/form/field.tsx.StyledInputfor number type.ArrowsContainer,ArrowButton, andStyledArrowIconstyled components for arrow buttons.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation