Protocol and Index_File #31
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
friendlymatthew
commented
Jan 9, 2024
|
Going to close this after today's sync. RIP 🦀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Still a draft, I plan on committing frequently for transparency
The first step was to translate
protocol.It should be fairly similar, with the only difference being a custom
FieldFlagsstruct.set()uses bitwise operations to set flags corresponding to differentFieldTypevalues.index_file.rsshould be fairly similar to the Go version, with the only difference being theIndexstruct takesFieldFlagas an attribute.Also,
IndexKeyis supposed to account for theanythat you see in the Go version.