Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOCS-904: WN edits and nav changes for RN too #350

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 9, 2024

Conversation

oliverhowell
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for frosty-curran-1fc0c4 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 836e77b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/frosty-curran-1fc0c4/deploys/66b63013568d91000856b25c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-350--frosty-curran-1fc0c4.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

NOTE: For new and improved features in Hazelcast Platform 5.5, see xref:{page-latest-supported-hazelcast}@hazelcast:ROOT:whats-new.adoc[What's new in Hazelcast Platform 5.5].
IMPORTANT: Hazelcast Management Center 5.5 requires Java 17 or later.

// Is this recent change? We don't have in 5.4 WN
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was true for 5.4 as well -- mentioned in the whats new for 5.4 but a bit hidden under "Upgrade Requirements"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, I see it. Probably better as an upfront Important as I've placed it. WDYT?


== Multi-version Rolling Upgrades
With Hazelcast Platform 5.5, it's now possible to execute Jet jobs only on the Lite members and therefore scale computational power independently of storage. Hazelcast has always supported promoting a Lite member to a Full member but in this release you can also now demote a Full member to a Lite member. Management Center supports this feature.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
With Hazelcast Platform 5.5, it's now possible to execute Jet jobs only on the Lite members and therefore scale computational power independently of storage. Hazelcast has always supported promoting a Lite member to a Full member but in this release you can also now demote a Full member to a Lite member. Management Center supports this feature.
With Hazelcast Platform 5.5, it's now possible to execute Jet jobs only on the Lite members and therefore scale computational power independently of storage. Hazelcast has always supported promoting a Lite member to a Full member but in this release you can also now demote a Full member to a Lite member. Management Center previously supported upgrading a lite member to full within the Members section of the UI and has been extended to support downgrading a full member to a lite member.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
With Hazelcast Platform 5.5, it's now possible to execute Jet jobs only on the Lite members and therefore scale computational power independently of storage. Hazelcast has always supported promoting a Lite member to a Full member but in this release you can also now demote a Full member to a Lite member. Management Center supports this feature.
With Hazelcast Platform 5.5, it's now possible to execute Jet jobs only on the Lite members and therefore scale computational power independently of storage. Management Center has always supported promoting a Lite member to a Full member but in this release you can also now demote a Full member to a Lite member.

@oliverhowell oliverhowell merged commit 7ce75ae into hazelcast:main Aug 9, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants