Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 17, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add colab notebook for fine-tuning mT5 on XNLI #44

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mayhewsw
Copy link

@mayhewsw mayhewsw commented Dec 30, 2020

This is basically copying the t5-trivia notebook from the T5 repo.

I've run this with mT5-small for a small number of steps (5700), and got the following validation accuracies.

INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.all_langs/accuracy at step 1005700: 65.673
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.ar/accuracy at step 1005700: 62.610
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.bg/accuracy at step 1005700: 68.956
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.de/accuracy at step 1005700: 68.072
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.el/accuracy at step 1005700: 67.671
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.en/accuracy at step 1005700: 79.960
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.es/accuracy at step 1005700: 72.129
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.fr/accuracy at step 1005700: 69.157
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.hi/accuracy at step 1005700: 61.446
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.ru/accuracy at step 1005700: 67.309
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.sw/accuracy at step 1005700: 55.422
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.th/accuracy at step 1005700: 64.177
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.tr/accuracy at step 1005700: 61.767
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.ur/accuracy at step 1005700: 57.912
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.vi/accuracy at step 1005700: 63.333
INFO:absl:eval/xnli_dev_test.zh/accuracy at step 1005700: 65.181

@google-cla
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Dec 30, 2020

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project (if not, look below for help). Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed (or fixed any issues), please reply here with @googlebot I signed it! and we'll verify it.


What to do if you already signed the CLA

Individual signers
Corporate signers

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@mayhewsw
Copy link
Author

mayhewsw commented Jan 4, 2021

@googlebot I signed it!

@lintingxue
Copy link
Contributor

Hey Stephen, thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately we don't accept external PRs for this repo.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants