Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kafka publishing queue using River #47

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Kafka publishing queue using River #47

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

sonnes
Copy link
Collaborator

@sonnes sonnes commented Jun 18, 2024

No description provided.

@sonnes sonnes changed the title Kafka processing queues Kafka publishing queue using River Jul 9, 2024
@sonnes sonnes marked this pull request as ready for review July 9, 2024 05:08
@sonnes sonnes requested a review from ajatprabha July 9, 2024 05:47
@sonnes sonnes force-pushed the kfq branch 2 times, most recently from 6bc9600 to 7d6dded Compare July 9, 2024 08:48
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.92%. Comparing base (1446392) to head (bdbb0b9).

Files Patch % Lines
kfq/riverkfq/publish.go 60.60% 13 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #47      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.03%   96.92%   -1.11%     
==========================================
  Files          46       48       +2     
  Lines        1067     1106      +39     
==========================================
+ Hits         1046     1072      +26     
- Misses         21       34      +13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sonnes sonnes merged commit ef9e1d7 into main Jul 9, 2024
5 checks passed
@sonnes sonnes deleted the kfq branch July 9, 2024 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants