Retry failed load_subgraph #475
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant OmenSubgraphHandler
participant Subgrounds
User->>OmenSubgraphHandler: Request to load subgraph
OmenSubgraphHandler->>Subgrounds: Call load_subgraph()
alt Success
Subgrounds-->>OmenSubgraphHandler: Return subgraph data
else Failure
OmenSubgraphHandler->>OmenSubgraphHandler: Retry load_subgraph() (up to 3 times)
Subgrounds-->>OmenSubgraphHandler: Return subgraph data
end
OmenSubgraphHandler-->>User: Return subgraph data
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.py (1)
Hardcoded URLs and Large Class Size Confirmed
The analysis confirms the presence of hardcoded URLs and a large number of methods within the
OmenSubgraphHandlerclass. Consider the following improvements:
- Configuration Management: Move hardcoded URLs to a configuration file to enhance flexibility and ease of updates.
- Method Organization: Refactor the class to split methods into separate classes or modules for better readability and maintainability.
- Documentation: Ensure all methods have comprehensive docstrings to improve code understandability.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-1024: Consider future refactoring for improved maintainabilityWhile not directly related to the current changes, there are a few areas where the code could be improved for better maintainability in the future:
Configuration Management: Consider moving hardcoded URLs and other constants to a configuration file. This would make it easier to manage different environments (e.g., development, staging, production) and update values without changing the code.
Method Organization: The class has grown quite large with numerous methods. Consider grouping related methods into separate classes or modules to improve readability and maintainability.
Type Hinting: While the code already uses type hints, ensure they are consistently applied throughout, especially for complex return types.
Documentation: Consider adding more inline documentation or docstrings to complex methods, explaining the purpose of various parameters and return values.
These suggestions are not urgent but could be considered for future refactoring efforts to improve the overall code quality and maintainability of the
OmenSubgraphHandlerclass.To assess the current state and potential areas for improvement, you could run the following:
This will provide an overview of the current code structure and highlight areas that might benefit from the suggested improvements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze code structure and documentation # Count the number of methods in the class echo "Number of methods in OmenSubgraphHandler:" rg "def " prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.py | wc -l # Check for existing docstrings echo "Methods with docstrings:" rg '"""' prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.py # Look for hardcoded URLs or constants echo "Potential hardcoded values:" rg "https://" prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.py rg "OMEN_" prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.pyLength of output: 3910
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.py (2)
74-84: LGTM: Retry logic added forload_subgraphmethodThe changes look good. The retry logic for the
load_subgraphmethod has been added, mirroring the existing retry logic for thequery_jsonmethod. This enhancement improves the robustness of the subgraph interaction by allowing recovery from transient failures when loading subgraphs.A few observations:
- The retry logic is consistent with the existing
query_jsonmethod, using the same parameters (3 attempts, 1-second wait).- The debug logging is implemented correctly, providing visibility into retry attempts.
- The comment has been updated to reflect that multiple methods are now being patched for retry behavior.
Line range hint
1-1024: Consider applying retry logic to subgraph loading methodsWhile the addition of retry logic to the
load_subgraphmethod is a good improvement, there might be an opportunity to extend this robustness to other methods that interact with subgraphs. Specifically, the__init__method loads several subgraphs, which could benefit from the same retry mechanism.Consider wrapping the subgraph loading calls in the
__init__method with the same retry logic. For example:def __init__(self) -> None: self.sg = Subgrounds() # Patch methods to retry on failure. self.sg.query_json = self._retry_decorator(self.sg.query_json) self.sg.load_subgraph = self._retry_decorator(self.sg.load_subgraph) keys = APIKeys() # Load the subgraphs with retry self.trades_subgraph = self._retry_decorator(self.sg.load_subgraph)( self.OMEN_TRADES_SUBGRAPH.format( graph_api_key=keys.graph_api_key.get_secret_value() ) ) # Apply similar changes to other subgraph loading calls... def _retry_decorator(self, func): return tenacity.retry( stop=tenacity.stop_after_attempt(3), wait=tenacity.wait_fixed(1), after=lambda x: logger.debug(f"{func.__name__} failed, {x.attempt_number=}."), )(func)This change would provide consistent retry behavior across all subgraph interactions, improving the overall robustness of the class.
To ensure this suggestion doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, you may want to run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any existing error handling in subgraph loading methods # Look for try-except blocks or error handling in __init__ method rg -A 10 -B 10 "def __init__" prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.py # Check for any custom error handling related to subgraph loading rg "load_subgraph" prediction_market_agent_tooling/markets/omen/omen_subgraph_handler.pyThis will help identify any existing error handling that might conflict with the proposed retry logic.
No description provided.