Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: schedule and schedule day environment variables #222

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

jmeridth
Copy link
Member

@jmeridth jmeridth commented Sep 12, 2024

Closes #217

Pull Request

Proposed Changes

  • new environment variables: SCHEDULE, SCHEDULE_DAY
  • update README with new environment variable information
  • passing specs

Readiness Checklist

Author/Contributor

  • If documentation is needed for this change, has that been included in this pull request
  • run make lint and fix any issues that you have introduced
  • run make test and ensure you have test coverage for the lines you are introducing
  • If publishing new data to the public (scorecards, security scan results, code quality results, live dashboards, etc.), please request review from @jeffrey-luszcz

Reviewer

  • Label as either fix, documentation, enhancement, infrastructure, maintenance or breaking

@jmeridth jmeridth self-assigned this Sep 12, 2024
@jmeridth jmeridth force-pushed the jm_add_schedule_env_var branch 2 times, most recently from f8e0466 to 220a0b6 Compare September 12, 2024 07:50
@jmeridth jmeridth changed the title feat: add ability to set dependabot schedule and schedule day via environment variables feat: schedule and schedule day environment variables Sep 12, 2024
…ironment variables

Closes github#217

- [x] new environment variables: SCHEDULE, SCHEDULE_DAY
- [x] update README with new environment variable information
- [x] passing specs

Signed-off-by: jmeridth <[email protected]>
@jmeridth
Copy link
Member Author

@zkoppert Should we encapsulate scheduling stuff in an object/class? I thought that too. This is a v0.1. but any additional scheduling items should be groups IMO.

dependabot_file.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Zack Koppert <[email protected]>
@zkoppert
Copy link
Member

@zkoppert Should we encapsulate scheduling stuff in an object/class? I thought that too. This is a v0.1. but any additional scheduling items should be groups IMO.

We can wait on an object/class for now. Happy to just get this through.

switched from git-all to just git (pinned)

Signed-off-by: jmeridth <[email protected]>
@jmeridth jmeridth merged commit 5f2cea9 into github:main Sep 16, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make the interval schedule in dependabot.yml configurable
2 participants