Expand FAQ for alternatives

index.html

@@ -164,12 +164,25 @@ <h2>FAQ</h2>
               protect against harmful free-riding.
             </dd>
 
+            <dt>What about AGPLv3 though?</dt>
+            <dd>
+              <a href="https://opensource.org/license/agpl-v3/">AGPLv3</a>
+              is not permissive enough. As a highly viral copyleft license, it
+              exposes users to serious licensing risk. FSL does not place any
+              conditions on users beyond simple attribution, so FSL software can
+              be adopted at organizations where AGPL is outside of policy.
+            </dd>
+
             <dt>Why not open core?</dt>
             <dd>
               <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-core_model"
                 >Open core</a
               >
-              is not permissive enough.
+              is not permissive enough. It restricts based on feature set, such
+              that some product features are <i>never</i> open. Moreover, the
+              percentage of features that are restricted is highly variable from
+              product to product. With FSL, all product features are available
+              now for almost all uses, and are soon fully permissive.
             </dd>
 
             <dt>Why not [some other alternative]?</dt>
@@ -226,6 +239,14 @@ <h2>FAQ</h2>
                 >Read the announcement</a
               >.
             </dd>
+
+            <dt>How do I adopt FSL for my product?</dt>
+            <dd>
+              Glad you asked!
+              <a href="https://github.com/getsentry/fsl.software#readme"
+                >Check out our guide on GitHub</a
+              >.
+            </dd>
           </dl>
         </div>
       </section>