actually spell check

DESCRIPTION

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ Imports:
     vctrs (>= 0.3.0)
 License: GPL-2 | GPL-3
 Suggests:
+    spelling,
     convey,
     DBI,
     dbplyr,
@@ -43,3 +44,4 @@ Suggests:
 Encoding: UTF-8
 VignetteBuilder: knitr
 RoxygenNote: 7.2.3
+Language: en-US

NEWS.md

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ for user-supplied replicate weights. (#153, thanks @bschneidr)
   * main user facing improvements are:
     * `dplyr::across()` now works within it
     * dplyr functions like `dplyr::cur_group()`, `dplyr::cur_group_id()`, `dplyr::cur_data()`
-    work in it (as well as new anlagous functions srvyr-specific `cur_svy()` and 
+    work in it (as well as new analogous functions srvyr-specific `cur_svy()` and 
     `cur_svy_full()`)
   * The only known breaking change is:
     * objects in the `summarize` will refer to the output of `summarize` before the input.

R/summarise.r

@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ summarise_.grouped_svy <- function(.data, ..., .dots) {
 #' You can use expressions both in the \code{...} of \code{summarize} and also
 #' in the arguments to the summarizing functions. Though this is valid syntactically
 #' it can also allow you to calculate incorrect results (for example if you multiply
-#' the mean by 100, the standard error is also multipled by 100, but the variance
+#' the mean by 100, the standard error is also multiplied by 100, but the variance
 #' is not).
 #'
 #' @examples

inst/WORDLIST

@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+AAPOR
+ACS
+Amostrais
+Andree
+Análise
+Batra
+COVID
+Chisquared
+Codecov
+Complexos
+Dados
+Damico's
+Damico’s
+Datbase
+Djalma
+Dịch
+ESS
+Filering
+Gelman's
+Gelman’s
+Github
+Guay
+Hadley
+Hartley
+Healy's
+Healy’s
+Horvitz
+INEGI
+IPUMS
+Jager
+Kieran
+Likert
+Lohr's
+Lohr’s
+Lumley's
+Lumley’s
+MonetDBLite
+NSE
+Nascimento
+Neale
+Ontiveros
+Overton's
+PMA
+PUMS
+Pessoa
+RSQLite
+Rao
+Rebecca
+Rstudio's
+Rstudio’s
+STS
+Serological
+Skovron
+Statist
+Summarise
+Suárez
+Taub
+Tiếng
+Usando
+Valle
+Việt
+Wakefield
+Wickham's
+Wickham’s
+YG
+Yay
+Zimmer
+acs
+ajdamico
+al
+asdfree
+blogpost
+ci
+coef
+cv
+công
+cộng
+dbplyr
+de
+deff
+degf
+del
+dep
+deviaton
+df
+dplyr
+dplyr's
+dplyr’s
+dụng
+eg
+español
+et
+eval
+forbearers
+gdfe
+gini
+github
+http
+https
+học
+iNZight
+ifelse
+ing
+intead
+io
+jugar
+los
+microdata
+microdatos
+notstatschat
+nse
+overton
+pkgdown
+português
+pps
+ppsmat
+pre
+programmatically
+purrr
+quasiquotation
+quosure
+quosures
+rearchitected
+rlang
+rlang's
+rlang’s
+rowwise
+rstats
+rstudio's
+rstudio’s
+sd
+se
+serosurvey
+soooo
+sql
+srvyr's
+srvyr’s
+stackoverflow
+stringr
+summarise
+svy
+svyby
+svyciprop
+svydesign
+svygini
+svymean
+svyquantile
+svyratio
+svytotal
+tbl
+tbls
+tibble
+tidycensus
+tidyr
+tidyselect
+tidyverse
+twophase
+tế
+tễ
+uid
+un
+ungrouped
+unpeeling
+vardpoor
+vartype
+và
+với
+ứng
+’s

tests/spelling.R

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+if(requireNamespace('spelling', quietly = TRUE))
+  spelling::spell_check_test(vignettes = TRUE, error = FALSE,
+                             skip_on_cran = TRUE)

vignettes/srvyr-vs-survey.Rmd

@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ strat_design %>%
   summarize(percentage = 100 * survey_mean())
 ```
 
-3) and you can even create varables inside of `group_by`
+3) and you can even create variables inside of `group_by`
 ```{r, message = FALSE}
 strat_design %>%
   group_by(api99_above_700 = api99 > 700) %>%
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ Here are some free resources put together by the community about srvyr:
 
 **Still need help?**
 
-I think the best way to get help is to form a specific question and ask it in some place like [rstudio's community webiste](https://community.rstudio.com) (known for it's friendly community) or [stackoverflow.com](https://stackoverflow.com) (maybe not known for being quite as friendly, but probably has more people). If you think you've found a bug in srvyr's code, please file an [issue on GitHub](https://github.com/gergness/srvyr/issues/new), but note that I'm not a great resource for helping specific issue, both because I have limited capacity but also because I do not consider myself an expert in the statistical methods behind survey analysis.
+I think the best way to get help is to form a specific question and ask it in some place like [rstudio's community website](https://community.rstudio.com) (known for it's friendly community) or [stackoverflow.com](https://stackoverflow.com) (maybe not known for being quite as friendly, but probably has more people). If you think you've found a bug in srvyr's code, please file an [issue on GitHub](https://github.com/gergness/srvyr/issues/new), but note that I'm not a great resource for helping specific issue, both because I have limited capacity but also because I do not consider myself an expert in the statistical methods behind survey analysis.
 
 **Have something to add?**