Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 1, 2024. It is now read-only.

Implement resize and train XRayVideo A/V with only resizing #796

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arjish
Copy link

@arjish arjish commented Aug 9, 2022

Summary:
We want to check whether training XRayVideo with simply video resizing (in addition to other existing transformation like horizontal flipping and normalization) without random corp is sufficient.

The resize dimension is used as 224*224.

workflow: f362077622 (Note: in the workflow fcc_mvit_dataset_v4p2_arkc.yaml is used which I renamed to fcc_mvit_dataset_v4p2_onlyresize.yaml in this diff.)

As can be seen, the validation MAP goes to around .422 as opposed to 0.46 when random resized crop is used (f355567669) and rest of the configuration is kept the same. Hence, it is better to keep random resized crop.

Differential Revision: D38522980

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported labels Aug 9, 2022
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38522980

arjish pushed a commit to arjish/ClassyVision that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2022
…research#796)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebookresearch#796

We want to check whether training XRayVideo with simply video resizing (in addition to other existing transformation like horizontal flipping and normalization) without random corp is sufficient.

The resize dimension is used as 224*224.

workflow: f362077622 (Note: in the workflow `fcc_mvit_dataset_v4p2_arkc.yaml` is used which I renamed to `fcc_mvit_dataset_v4p2_onlyresize.yaml` in this diff.)

As can be seen, the validation MAP goes to around .422 as opposed to 0.46 when random resized crop is used (f355567669) and rest of the configuration is kept the same. Hence, it is better to keep random resized crop.

Differential Revision: D38522980

fbshipit-source-id: 273f0cb1ebe644c13a739d720344fe31fd25fa17
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38522980

…research#796)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: facebookresearch#796

We want to check whether training XRayVideo with simply video resizing (in addition to other existing transformation like horizontal flipping and normalization) without random corp is sufficient.

The resize dimension is used as 224*224.

workflow: f362077622 (Note: in the workflow `fcc_mvit_dataset_v4p2_arkc.yaml` is used which I renamed to `fcc_mvit_dataset_v4p2_onlyresize.yaml` in this diff.)

As can be seen, the validation MAP goes to around .422 as opposed to 0.46 when random resized crop is used (f355567669) and rest of the configuration is kept the same. Hence, it is better to keep random resized crop.

Differential Revision: D38522980

fbshipit-source-id: 037690a4dccf9c3ee66b353792cb30b22bae8161
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38522980

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants