Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding analyzer feedback for need for speed concept exercise #2702

Conversation

manumafe98
Copy link
Contributor

@manumafe98 manumafe98 commented Jan 31, 2024

pull request

Related issue: #2682

As the exercise does not have loops as a prerequisites, and we do not have a concept that introduces to while loops I made some slight changes to the reference resolution as well

Also I got my inspiration for the go analyzer

Reviewer Resources:

Track Policies

Also as loops are not a prerequisite of the concept I made some changes to the reference resolution
@manumafe98 manumafe98 added the x:size/small Small amount of work label Jan 31, 2024
@manumafe98 manumafe98 self-assigned this Jan 31, 2024
@sanderploegsma
Copy link
Contributor

I'm reading through the original .meta/design.md and it seems to be a copy of the one from elons-toy-car. It stood out because it mentions that constructors are out-of-scope, while the exercise teaches the concept of a constructor. 😂

So I would suggest updating the entire file in this PR to address this.

@manumafe98
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm reading through the original .meta/design.md and it seems to be a copy of the one from elons-toy-car. It stood out because it mentions that constructors are out-of-scope, while the exercise teaches the concept of a constructor. 😂

So I would suggest updating the entire file in this PR to address this.

Oh, good catch, okey I would update the entire file then

Copy link
Contributor

@sanderploegsma sanderploegsma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@manumafe98 manumafe98 merged commit 4dc6768 into exercism:main Feb 1, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
x:size/small Small amount of work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants