build: bump TRS API specs

[kushagra189]

Description

• Update latest spec versions as defined here.
• Minor tweaks in test cases.
• Current specs do not support security definitions.

Fixes #108

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Maintenance

Checklist:

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• I have not reduced the existing code coverage
• I have added docstrings following the Python style guidelines of this project to all new modules, classes, methods and functions are documented with docstrings following; I have updated any previously existing docstrings, if applicable
• I have updated any sections of the app's documentation that are affected by the proposed changes, if applicable

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.17% 🎉

Comparison is base (d9f098f) 94.70% compared to head (7ba671e) 94.88%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #109      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.70%   94.88%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         586      586              
==========================================
+ Hits          555      556       +1     
+ Misses         31       30       -1     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
trs_filer/version.py	100.00% <100.00%> (+100.00%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[uniqueg]

Looks good. But I'm wondering: Don't the updated specs require any changes to the controllers at all?

Also, what exactly do you mean by:

Current specs do not support security definitions

?

[kushagra189]

Oh just that with the current updated specs for trs-filer, we have not added the bearer token and other definitions.

[uniqueg]

That's fine, we can add them through FOCA, no? If it's not in the specs, it just means we can do what we want 🤷

[uniqueg]

What about changes to controllers? None of the spec changes require behavioral changes?

[kushagra189]

That's fine, we can add them through FOCA, no? If it's not in the specs, it just means we can do what we want 🤷

Yes we can add them via FOCA, we have just comment those specs for now.

[kushagra189]

What about changes to controllers? None of the spec changes require behavioral changes?

Nope, we had the edges covered. Minor change was required in one of the integration test.

[uniqueg]

Approved!