Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make default calendar checkbox insensitive if read-only #730

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 11, 2021

Conversation

mcclurgm
Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator

@mcclurgm mcclurgm commented Dec 4, 2021

Fixes an issue reported in #553. Previously we didn't check whether a calendar is read-only, so you could set it as default, with some strange results. This fixes that by disabling the checkbox.

Since a disabled checkbox can now mean multiple things (read-only calendar if unchecked, or already default if checked), should we add a label explaining why it's disabled? I'm not sure if that's necessary, but it could be helpful.

@mcclurgm mcclurgm requested a review from a team December 4, 2021 22:56
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeremypw jeremypw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has the expected effect and makes sense (although I am not entirely clear why my Births and Anniversaries calendar is read-only?)

@mcclurgm
Copy link
Sponsor Collaborator Author

My assumption is that it polls that information from contact details, although that's speculative as I don't use it.

@jeremypw
Copy link
Collaborator

@mcclurgm Yes, I think your right. I am not sure how to add any birthdays and anniversaries using other Elementary apps. Friends is not released yet and doesnt seem to handle birthdays and anniversaries.

@jeremypw jeremypw merged commit 9c41107 into elementary:master Dec 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants