UpdateServicesComputerTargetGroup: New resource - managing computer target groups

[Borgquite]

Pull Request (PR) description

A rebased pull for #60
It looks OK to me, waiting to see if it passes the Pester tests as these may need updating to support 5

This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues

• Fixes Target Groups Creation #44

Task list

• Added an entry under the Unreleased section of the change log in the CHANGELOG.md.
  Entry should say what was changed, and how that affects users (if applicable).
• Resource documentation added/updated in README.md.
• Resource parameter descriptions added/updated in README.md, schema.mof
  and comment-based help.
• Comment-based help added/updated.
• Localization strings added/updated in all localization files as appropriate.
• Examples appropriately added/updated.
• Unit tests added/updated. See DSC Resource Testing Guidelines.
• Integration tests added/updated (where possible). See DSC Resource Testing Guidelines.
• New/changed code adheres to DSC Resource Style Guidelines and Best Practices.

---

This change is 

[Borgquite]

Hey, @johlju. Trying to rebase per our discussion in #60. However the tests are failing for resources that I'm not touching, in a way that I haven't seen before - all saying ' Cannot find the Windows PowerShell data file 'MSFT_UpdateServicesApprovalRule.strings.psd1' in directory xxx' but the files they reference seem to appear in the module - feels like this is unrelated to my pull request. Can you advise?

I guess I may also need to update the pester tests for v5 similar to #74 but I think this issue needs resolving first.

[johlju]

Will have a look as soon as I have time.

[Borgquite]

@johlju Quick reminder when you have a few minutes to check out the issue with the tests here :)

[johlju]

@Borgquite if you wouldn't mind reviewing PR #79 so I can merge it, then this PR should be able to run the tests again after it has been rebased. 🙂

[johlju]

I merged PR #79 so this one can be rebased.

[Borgquite]

I merged PR #79 so this one can be rebased.

Thanks - I'll see if I can get the tests to resolve myself now, will keep you posted!

[johlju]

Ping me when the tests passes on this one, I will try to get the time to review. 🙂

[Borgquite]

Ping me when the tests passes on this one, I will try to get the time to review. 🙂

Thanks - doing some fairly major reworking of the rest of UpdateServicesDsc (it's missing tonnes of useful parameters, breaks a lot of DSC 'rules' from my PoV, e.g. as others have noted, certain parameters take effect even when they are 'unspecified') and it generally just needs some love. I'll keep you posted.