Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(math) refactor ApproxRoot() for better read and perf #22226

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shdhsj
Copy link

@shdhsj shdhsj commented Oct 11, 2024

…ance

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved logic for the ApproxRoot method, enhancing root calculation efficiency.
    • Added explicit handling for special cases in root calculations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined convergence checks for better performance during calculations.

@shdhsj shdhsj requested review from testinginprod, alpe and a team as code owners October 11, 2024 02:42
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the LegacyDec struct and its ApproxRoot method in the math/dec.go file. The method's logic has been improved, including a new initial guess for root calculation, refined handling of special cases, and a streamlined iterative process for Newton's method. The convergence check has also been enhanced for better efficiency. The method signature remains unchanged despite the internal logic updates.

Changes

File Change Summary
math/dec.go Modifications to LegacyDec struct and ApproxRoot method; improved logic, handling of special cases, streamlined iterative process, enhanced convergence check.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant LegacyDec
    participant ApproxRoot

    User->>LegacyDec: Call ApproxRoot(root)
    LegacyDec->>ApproxRoot: Set initial guess to LegacyOneDec()
    ApproxRoot->>ApproxRoot: Check if root is 1 or decimal is 0
    ApproxRoot->>ApproxRoot: Handle special case for decimal equals one
    ApproxRoot->>ApproxRoot: Enter iterative process for Newton's method
    ApproxRoot->>ApproxRoot: Calculate delta
    ApproxRoot->>ApproxRoot: Check convergence
    ApproxRoot-->>LegacyDec: Return guess and error
    LegacyDec-->>User: Return result
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
math/dec.go (2)

475-478: Good addition of special cases for root == 1 and d.IsZero()

The logic correctly handles cases where the root is 1 or the decimal is zero, returning the decimal directly. This optimization avoids unnecessary calculations and improves performance.

Suggestion: Consider adding unit tests for these special cases to ensure they behave as expected.


480-483: Efficient handling of d == 1 case

By returning LegacyOneDec() when d equals 1, you optimize the function by avoiding unnecessary iterations.

Suggestion: Add unit tests to cover the scenario when d equals 1, verifying that the function returns the correct result.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e84c0eb and b01fb42.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • math/dec.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
math/dec.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
math/dec.go (1)

489-493: Improved initialization and constants

Initializing guess to LegacyOneDec() and precomputing rootDec and rootMinusOne enhance the clarity and potential performance of the iterative method.

Comment on lines +495 to 513
// Iteratively apply Newton's method
for iter := 0; iter < maxApproxRootIterations; iter++ {
// Compute guess^(root-1)
prev := guess.Power(rootMinusOne)
if prev.IsZero() {
prev = smallestDec
prev = smallestDec // avoid division by zero
}
delta.Set(d).QuoMut(prev)
delta.SubMut(guess)
delta.QuoInt64Mut(int64(root))

// delta = (d / guess^(root-1) - guess) / root
delta := d.Quo(prev).Sub(guess).Quo(rootDec)

// Update guess: guess = guess + delta
guess.AddMut(delta)

// If delta is small enough, break early (convergence)
if delta.Abs().LT(smallestDec) {
break
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactored Newton's method improves performance and readability

The iterative application of Newton's method has been streamlined. Simplifying the calculation of delta and adding an effective convergence check with smallestDec enhances both performance and readability. The handling of potential division by zero with prev.IsZero() is appropriate.

Suggestion: To further align with the Uber Golang style guide, consider adding comments explaining the choice of smallestDec to avoid division by zero, and clarifying the convergence criteria.

Code Improvement: You might consider encapsulating the convergence criteria and the division by zero handling into separate helper functions to enhance modularity and readability.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title refactor:(ApproxRoot) refact ApproxRoot() for better read and perform… refactor(math) refactor ApproxRoot() for better read and perf Oct 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants