docs: modify the corresponding link in the code document #22151
Conversation
xiaobei0715
requested review from
cool-develope,
alpe and
a team
as code owners
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in the pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
x/feegrant/README.md (4)
Line range hint
26-103: LGTM: Comprehensive explanation of key conceptsThe Concepts section provides clear and detailed explanations of Grant, FeeAllowanceI, and various fee allowance types. The inclusion of protobuf and Go code references enhances understanding. The explanation of the FeeGranter flag is particularly useful for developers.
Consider adding a brief example or use case for each fee allowance type to further illustrate their practical applications.
Line range hint
136-155: LGTM: Clear description of module messagesThe Messages section provides concise explanations of MsgGrantAllowance and MsgRevokeAllowance messages, including helpful protobuf references.
Consider adding a brief description of the purpose and typical use case for each message to provide more context for developers.
Line range hint
193-324: LGTM: Comprehensive CLI documentationThe CLI part of the Client section provides clear and detailed explanations of query and transaction commands. The inclusion of example commands and outputs greatly enhances understanding. The transaction commands cover various scenarios, which is particularly helpful for users.
Consider adding a brief explanation of the flags used in the example commands, especially for the more complex ones like
--periodand--period-limit, to provide more context for users who might be unfamiliar with these concepts.
Line range hint
326-391: LGTM: Clear gRPC endpoint documentationThe gRPC part of the Client section provides clear explanations of how to query the feegrant module using gRPC endpoints. The inclusion of example commands and outputs for both the Allowance and Allowances endpoints greatly enhances understanding for developers.
Consider adding a brief explanation of how to install and use the
grpcurltool, or provide alternative methods (e.g., using a programming language with gRPC support) for developers who might not be familiar withgrpcurl.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- x/feegrant/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
x/feegrant/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/feegrant/README.md (3)
Line range hint
1-24: LGTM: Clear and well-structured introductionThe Abstract provides a concise overview of the fee grant module, and the Contents section accurately reflects the document's structure, making it easy for readers to navigate.
Line range hint
105-134: LGTM: Clear explanation of state managementThe State section provides a detailed and clear explanation of how FeeAllowance and FeeAllowanceQueue are stored in the state. The inclusion of Go code references and the detailed description of key structures enhance understanding for developers.
Line range hint
157-191: LGTM: Comprehensive list of module eventsThe Events section provides a clear and comprehensive list of events emitted by the feegrant module. The tabular format effectively presents the event types, attribute keys, and attribute values for each event, making it easy for developers to understand and work with these events.
|
Thanks! Could you modify all the links of feegrant to use a tag instead (v0.52.0-beta.1 for instance), so it doesn't happen again? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
x/feegrant/README.md (2)
Line range hint
26-116: LGTM: Comprehensive explanation of fee grant conceptsThe Concepts section has been significantly improved with detailed explanations of Grant, BasicAllowance, PeriodicAllowance, and AllowedMsgAllowance. The addition of the FeeGranter flag explanation is particularly useful for CLI users.
Consider adding a brief example or use case for each allowance type to further illustrate their practical applications.
Line range hint
216-359: LGTM: Comprehensive CLI documentation with examplesThe Client section provides detailed instructions for using the CLI to interact with the feegrant module. The inclusion of examples for various commands and scenarios is particularly helpful for users.
Consider adding a brief explanation of the output for the transaction commands (grant and revoke) to provide users with a complete understanding of the CLI interaction.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- x/feegrant/README.md (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
x/feegrant/README.md (1)
Pattern
**/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"
🔇 Additional comments (5)
x/feegrant/README.md (5)
Line range hint
1-24: LGTM: Clear abstract and well-structured contentsThe addition of an abstract provides a concise introduction to the fee grant module, and the structured contents section improves navigation through the document. These changes enhance the overall usability of the documentation.
Line range hint
118-162: LGTM: Clear explanation of state managementThe State section provides a comprehensive explanation of how FeeAllowance and FeeAllowanceQueue are stored and managed. The inclusion of code references and the explanation of the pruning mechanism add valuable technical details.
Line range hint
164-178: LGTM: Clear description of module messagesThe Messages section succinctly describes MsgGrantAllowance and MsgRevokeAllowance. The inclusion of protobuf definitions for both message types provides valuable technical information for developers.
Line range hint
180-214: LGTM: Well-organized events documentationThe Events section provides a clear and concise overview of the events emitted by the feegrant module. The use of tables to organize the events and their attributes enhances readability and makes it easy for developers to understand the event structure.
Line range hint
361-428: LGTM: Clear gRPC documentation with examplesThe gRPC part of the Client section provides clear explanations of how to use the Allowance and Allowances endpoints. The inclusion of example commands and their corresponding outputs is particularly helpful for developers working with gRPC.
OK, I have made modifications. |
julienrbrt
added
the
backport/v0.52.x
(cherry picked from commit 46b01ba)
…2151) (#22157) Co-authored-by: XiaoBei <[email protected]>
Description
The original code has been updated, but the corresponding line count for this link has not been updated.
This PR changes it to the correct corresponding numbers of rows.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit