fix: TestOfferSnapshot flake #3957
Conversation
rootulp
requested review from
cmwaters and
evan-forbes
and removed request for
a team
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/app_test.go (1)
169-172: Good addition of cleanup for snapshot databaseThis cleanup function ensures proper closure of the snapshot database, which is crucial for resource management. The use of
t.Cleanupis correct, and error checking is implemented properly.For consistency with the previous cleanup function, consider using
require.NoError(t, err)instead ofrequire.NoError(t, err).Here's a suggested minor improvement for consistency:
t.Cleanup(func() { err := snapshotDB.Close() - require.NoError(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err) })
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- app/app_test.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
app/app_test.go (3)
5-5: LGTM: Import ofospackageThe addition of the
ospackage import is appropriate for the file system operations introduced in the cleanup tasks.
164-167: Excellent addition of cleanup for snapshot directoryThis cleanup function effectively addresses the flakiness issue mentioned in the PR objectives. It ensures that the temporary snapshot directory is removed after the test, preventing the "directory not empty" error during cleanup.
The use of
t.Cleanupis the correct approach for test cleanup in Go, and the error checking is properly implemented.
Line range hint
1-224: Summary: Effective solution to TestOfferSnapshot flakinessThe changes in this file successfully address the flakiness issue in the
TestOfferSnapshottest case. By adding proper cleanup functions for both the snapshot directory and the snapshot database, the PR ensures that temporary resources are correctly managed and removed after test execution.These additions align well with Go testing best practices and effectively solve the problem described in the PR objectives. The implementation is clean, error-handling is appropriate, and the changes don't introduce any new issues.
Great job on resolving this flakiness issue!
Closes #3956