[PM-12967] Create bitwarden-wasm-internal

[Hinton]

🎟️ Tracking

https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-12967

📔 Objective

PM SDK. Based on the research spike in #1077

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation
  team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
  issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – a3bb6e36-d0aa-454d-8878-3dad461a11d4

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.32%. Comparing base (66949af) to head (bb20e46).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/bitwarden-wasm-internal/src/client.rs	0.00%	27 Missing ⚠️
...rates/bitwarden-core/src/client/client_settings.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1089      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.44%   58.32%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         192      193       +1     
  Lines       13528    13557      +29     
==========================================
  Hits         7907     7907              
- Misses       5621     5650      +29     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[michalchecinski]

We should split the build and publish workflows. If it's needed to publish it on every push to main, I suggest triggering the publishing workflow here. An example of that can be found in the build-swift.yml workflow:

sdk/.github/workflows/build-swift.yml

Lines 101 to 115 in 90f8a54

	- name: Trigger Swift release
	uses: actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea # v7.0.1
	with:
	github-token: ${{ steps.retrieve-secret-pat.outputs.github-pat-bitwarden-devops-bot-repo-scope }}
	script: |
	await github.rest.actions.createWorkflowDispatch({
	owner: 'bitwarden',
	repo: 'sdk',
	workflow_id: 'release-swift.yml',
	ref: 'main',
	inputs: {
	'build-run-id': '${{ github.run_id }}',
	'pre-release': 'true'
	}
	})

BTW is it released to npmjs.com or to github packages?

[Hinton]

Currently gh packages, but we will probably change it to npmjs.