Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update UMICollapse to 1.1.0 #51441

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Update UMICollapse to 1.1.0 #51441

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

siddharthab
Copy link
Contributor

@siddharthab siddharthab commented Oct 16, 2024

Also changes the source GitHub repo to another fork because the original author is non-responsive.

Some discussion on this in nf-core/rnaseq#1087 (comment)


Bot commands for PR management

Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:

Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:

@BiocondaBot please update Merge the master branch into a PR.
@BiocondaBot please add label Add the please review & merge label.
@BiocondaBot please fetch artifacts Post links to CI-built packages/containers.
You can use this to test packages locally.

Note that the @BiocondaBot please merge command is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.

Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include @bioconda/<team> and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed <team>.

Also changes the source GitHub repo to another fork. Some discussion on this in nf-core/rnaseq#1087 (comment)
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 16, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces comprehensive updates to the meta.yaml file for the umicollapse package. Key changes include the renaming of the package from "UMICollapse" to "umicollapse" and an increment in the version number from "1.0.0" to "1.1.0". The SHA256 checksum has been updated to a new value, and the build number has been decreased from 1 to 0. Additionally, the source URL has been modified to reflect a change in the repository path from CharlotteAnne to siddharthab, while retaining the version tag in the URL. A new run_exports section has been added under the build section, which includes a pinning directive for the subpackage. The overall structure of the file remains consistent, with no changes to the package requirements or other sections.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update meta.yaml for spec2vec #49857: The meta.yaml file for spec2vec was updated to include a new run_exports section, similar to the changes made in the umicollapse package's meta.yaml.
  • Update: Metabuli 1.0.8 #51030: The meta.yaml file for metabuli was updated with a new run_exports section, which aligns with the addition of this section in the umicollapse package's meta.yaml.
  • Update recipe for ViroConstrictor #51038: The meta.yaml file for ViroConstrictor was modified to include updates to the run_exports section, reflecting a similar change in the umicollapse package.
  • Update hmftools-bam-tools to 1.3_beta #51142: The meta.yaml file for hmftools-bam-tools was updated with a new SHA256 checksum and version number, akin to the changes made in the umicollapse package.
  • Update peaks2utr to 1.3.3 #51170: The meta.yaml file for peaks2utr included an updated SHA256 checksum and version number, paralleling the updates in the umicollapse package.
  • [biobb_analysis] update 5.0.0 #51431: The meta.yaml file for biobb_analysis was updated with a new version and SHA256 checksum, similar to the changes in the umicollapse package.
  • [biobb_chemistry] update 5.0.0 #51435: The meta.yaml file for biobb_chemistry was updated with a new version and SHA256 checksum, reflecting changes made in the umicollapse package.

Suggested labels

autobump, new version

Suggested reviewers

  • martin-g

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/umicollapse/meta.yaml (1)

11-11: Consider resetting the build number.

For a new version release, it's typically recommended to reset the build number to 0. This allows for potential rebuilds of the same version if needed.

Consider applying the following change:

-  number: 1
+  number: 0
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13c62a4 and e180d16.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/umicollapse/meta.yaml (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/umicollapse/meta.yaml (3)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 1.0.0 to 1.1.0, which is consistent with the PR objective.


14-14: Source URL update looks correct, but requires verification.

The source URL has been updated to use the fork by siddharthab, which is consistent with the PR objective. This change addresses the issue of the original author's lack of responsiveness.

Please verify the following:

  1. Ensure that the siddharthab/UMICollapse repository is a legitimate fork of the original project.
  2. Confirm that this fork contains the expected updates for version 1.1.0.
  3. Check if there's any documentation or announcement regarding this change of maintainership.

You can use the following commands to gather more information:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather information about the new source repository

# Check if the repository exists and is public
gh repo view siddharthab/UMICollapse

# List tags to verify the presence of v1.1.0
gh api repos/siddharthab/UMICollapse/tags --jq '.[].name'

# Check for any README updates or announcements about the fork
gh api repos/siddharthab/UMICollapse/readme | jq -r .content | base64 -d | grep -i "fork"

3-3: Verify the SHA256 checksum.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated. Please ensure that this new checksum correctly corresponds to the source package for version 1.1.0.

To verify the checksum, you can use the following command:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/umicollapse/meta.yaml (1)

40-40: LGTM: DOI addition is valuable. Consider formatting improvement.

The addition of the DOI is excellent for citing the associated research paper. To improve readability and searchability, consider formatting it as a full URL.

Consider updating the DOI to a full URL:

-    minutes with this tool with real datasets! doi 10.7717/peerj.8275.
+    minutes with this tool with real datasets! DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8275
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8696ea and 4dc0155.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/umicollapse/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/umicollapse/meta.yaml

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
recipes/umicollapse/meta.yaml (4)

1-3: LGTM: Package metadata updates look good.

The changes to the package name, version, and SHA256 checksum are consistent with the PR objectives. The lowercase package name aligns with common naming conventions.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


10-13: LGTM: Build section updates are appropriate.

The build number reset to 0 is correct for a new package version. The addition of the run_exports section with pin_subpackage is a good practice for maintaining ABI compatibility across minor version updates.


Line range hint 19-39: LGTM: Unchanged sections maintain consistency.

The requirements, test, and about sections remain unchanged, which is appropriate for a version update that doesn't introduce new dependencies or change the package's core functionality.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 37-37: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 38-38: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 39-39: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


16-16: Verify the new source repository.

The source URL has been updated to use the new fork as mentioned in the PR objectives. This change looks good, but it's important to ensure that the new repository is properly maintained and contains the expected code for version 1.1.0.

To verify the new source repository, please run the following script:

@mencian mencian merged commit 4555528 into bioconda:master Oct 17, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants