Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add board defs for sparkfun board variants of RP2040 #17

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: rp2040_pr
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Wenn0101
Copy link

Summary of changes

Add support for Sparkfun variants of RP2040. Not 100% if I am creating a PR into the correct branch, but I have created targets for the RP2040 boards that are made by SparkFun.

All three targets can be found on this page:
https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/rp2040/getting-started/

With more information on these SparkFun product pages:
https://www.sparkfun.com/products/17717
https://www.sparkfun.com/products/17745
https://www.sparkfun.com/products/17720

Please let me know if you are interested in taking these changes and adding these boards to this branch. We are also working on a porting these targets to arduino using the mbed arduino core .

Impact of changes

Add 3 new targets:
SFE_RP2040_PRO_MICRO
SFE_RP2040_THING_PLUS
SFE_RP2040_MICROMOD

Migration actions required

Documentation


Pull request type

[x] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[x] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@facchinm


@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented May 25, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@facchinm
Copy link
Member

facchinm commented Jul 9, 2021

Hi @Wenn0101 , sorry for the late response.
I'll be super happy to merge these but we still need to smooth some rough edges of the porting (and pass all the tests) before making it official, so I'd rather wait a bit and merge when we are ready for prime time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants